چکیده:
Certainly، democracy، the public sphere of human activity، why do people in this area tend to interact with each other and Express their demands and interests. Social movements، which Expresses the demands of the people، in the public arena are formed and are active. But to explain the activities of new social movements، such as the mobilization of additional benefits based on rational choice theory، would be helpful. The reason for this change of representation، and in particular the objectives of these movements the way activities. The movements of the other follows Individual and group interests are focused on the use of instrumental rationality theories are trivial. What is the main concern of the study، methods of analysis and explain how the activities and purposes، by the new social movements. With regard to the active The public sphere ities of these movements are spreading out and based on dialogue and communication are، the basic relationship can be drawn between them and Hagerman’s theory of deliberative democracy .thus، on the one hand، the activities of these movements in its limitless، and on the other hand، the world wide intents and purposes they are and what binds these two together، the sense of Hagerman’s communicative rationality. In fact، this research seeks to explore and demonstrate the implications of Hagerman’s theory of communicative rationality is that the social movement has gone way up. According to the world wide conjectural goalsT both from the perspective of Hagerman’s Deliberative Democracy، and new social movements، and also the mode of communication and dialogue، on bedsides can be significant coordination between the two was observed. This paper argues that، as a new social movement، like movement for disarmament، green movement، borrowed from the Hagerman’s deliberative democracy، whether in practice or in terms of this theory have been affected، various aspects of this relationship that is trying to be portrayed. Methods of this descriptive-analytical and using library resources and documents.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Deliberative Democracy; Social Movements and the Global Public Sphere (With Emphasis on Habermas's Theory of Communicative Rationality) Alireza Samiei Esfahani 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Yasuj University Sajjad Mirali Master Student of Political Science, Yasuj University (Received: 2013/03/30 - Approved: 2013/12/10) Abstract Democracy is undoubtedly the arena of human activities; because humans interact with each other in this field and express their requests and interests.
This research seeks to investigate and evaluate the extent to which communicative rationality in Habermas's theory affects the way new social movements operate and organize, as well as the types of methods, strategies, and tactics they adopt to achieve their goals.
These movements, by adopting theoretical elements of communicative action from Habermas's theory of deliberative democracy, have presented a new style of political participation in human society.
With this description, the main research question is: what role and position does Habermas's deliberative or conversational democracy have in the types of methods, procedures, and strategies adopted by new social movements, and what impact does this have on the public sphere, especially in the global arena?
Thus, the generalization of Habermas's communicative rationality, which he himself considered the practical condition for its realization to be the elimination of all power structures in the public sphere, has the most important task as the center of gravity of this movement's operations.
- Considering the emphasis of new social movements on reviving and reconstructing the public sphere, a direct and logical relationship can be drawn between this kind of problem-solving and Habermas's communicative rationality.
(
, 
, 
)
