چکیده:
In Shia jurisprudence, narrations are among the most important sources of legal rulings. Ambiguity in narrations—whether verbal or conceptual—is one of the significant obstacles that makes understanding the legislator's intent difficult. This matter has led some narrations to be interpreted as 'Qadiyya fi al-Waqi'ah' (a ruling specific to a particular incident). Consequently, the possibility of deriving legal rulings from narrations faces challenges. This article, with a comparative-jurisprudential approach and using library and descriptive methods, examines the impact of ambiguity on the process of interpreting narrations as 'Qadiyya fi al-Waqi'ah'. The research findings show that the source of ambiguity can be traced to three domains: the subject matter, the action of the agent, and the attributes and accidental states of the agent; this very issue has caused some jurists to exclude narrations affected by ambiguity from the cycle of deriving legal rulings.
خلاصه ماشینی:
172-173, بَابُ النَّوَادِر، h14) One of the controversial issues in the subject of Jihad is the method of burying the dead; the majority of Shiite jurists consider only the burial of a Muslim to be obligatory and have based their evidence on this very narration (Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, 1408 AH, Vol. 1, p.
Other views regarding the narration It is worth mentioning that according to the opinion of some jurists, this narration should be categorized under the third type of ambiguity (ambiguity of states occurring to the doer); for example, Muhaqqiq Khoei has considered the reason for interpreting the narration as a qadiyya fi al-waqi'a to be that perhaps Ali ibn Ja'far was suffering from an illness or an excuse for which the Imam( did not rule the action invalid, and this very possibility causes the deduction of a general ruling from the narration to face an obstacle (Khoei, 1410 AH, Vol. 4, p.
However, despite this, according to the claim of Ibn Abbas, the Noble Prophet (SAW) used musk before visiting the House of God, and this very issue has led Muhaqqiq al-Naraqi and Ruhani to interpret this narration as a 'qadiyya fi al-waqi'ah' (a case-specific ruling) and to suggest the possibility of Hajj Ghayr al-Tamattu (naraqi, 1415 AH, Vol. 12, p.
Sheikh Tusi, Muhammad bin Hasan, al-Khilaf, Khorasani Ali, Shahrastani Sayyid Jawad, Taha Najaf Mahdi, Iraqi Mujtaba, Qom, Islamic Publishing Office affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Qom Seminary, 1st edition, 1407 AH.
(
, 
, 
)
