چکیده:
The current research was conducted with the aim of managing public opinion in support of the fundamental values of the foreign policy of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The qualitative research method was based on grounded theory, relying on the semi-structured interview technique, during which 22 professors of social sciences, political sciences, and future studies of Tehran and Allameh Tabatabai universities were interviewed through targeted theoretical sampling. The findings showed that casting doubt on the fundamental principles of foreign policy, Iranophobia and Islamophobia, weak and inefficient government, luxurious lifestyle and corruption of the officials and creating doubt on the proposition of the hostility of America and the Zionist regime to Iran, weakens public opinion in support of the fundamental values of politics. The foreigner of the Islamic Republic was by the enemy. In the face of such doubts, bringing the discourse of the government closer to the society on the issue of the fundamental values of the system's foreign policy (anti-arrogance and support for the oppressed), changing the form of anti-Americanism and anti-Zionism in the country, cultural planning and management of the media and social networks as the most important solutions for issuing and supporting One of the fundamental values of J.A.'s foreign policy was the management of public opinion. As a result, it can be acknowledged that public opinion can both support the fundamental values of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran and undermine these values. Therefore,
خلاصه ماشینی:
In such a way that, in addition to anti-imperialism, other components can be mentioned, such as the formation of geographical strategic depth, influence on the public opinion of regional countries, the shaping of the axis of resistance and liberation groups as the external arms protecting Iran's interests, the expansion of security, political, and economic cooperation in the region, confrontation with imperialism, and the acceptance of Iran as an influential regional power by the United States and other Western governments, military, nuclear, and missile advancements in line with the rejection of any form of domination, the creation of cultural strategic depth at the global level (the acceptance of the discourse of supporting the oppressed nation of Palestine at the global level; this value-oriented discourse of Iran's foreign policy has now turned into a global demand at the level of nations and some countries, and alignment and harmony with this Iranian value is observed), becoming a practical model of independence-seeking, progress, and development based on the Shia Islamic discourse among Muslim countries, all of which have contributed to increasing national security and the generation and enhancement of power as the most important 35 Public opinion management, a soft power tool in support of ...
Regardless of these ideological confrontations, and based on the meta-analysis conducted by the researchers of this study with careful consideration of existing research in this field, it seems that doubts have been created by imperialism in recent years, aimed at weakening the values of the Revolution and the Islamic system and their dissemination to the world, within the mindset of a fraction of Iranian society, which is based on several propositions: First, the type of foreign policy and interaction with Iran's neighboring and extra-regional countries does not follow a codified program, and Iran has not been able to establish a level of friendly relations with neighboring countries and other powers; for example, Iran's interactions with the countries of 37 Public opinion management, a soft power tool in support of ...
(
, 
, 
)
