چکیده:
By referring to the books on the rules of Arabic grammar, we encounter explanations that attempt to discover the wisdoms and purposes of the Arabic language. Such causes are called secondary causes. Since distinguishing correct causes from corrupt ones requires a precise understanding of this type of cause as well as specific criteria for validation, we have examined the nature of secondary causes and their types in the discourse of ancient grammarians. Furthermore, based on the classification of Ibn Mudha al-Qurtubi, one of the opponents of secondary causes, and using Al-Suyuti's book Al-Iqtirah, we have mentioned and then examined criteria for detecting the corruption of secondary causes. The importance of this research lies in the fact that identifying correct secondary causes requires knowing them as well as the criteria. Additionally, one must have a correct perspective on the Arabic language and integrate the views of the ancients with the findings of grammarians after them to reach a comprehensive view.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Investigation of the Types of Secondary Causes and Their Validity Mohammad Mahdi Mahdavi Far 1 Abstract By referring to the books of Arabic grammar rules, we encounter explanations that attempt to discover the wisdoms and purposes of the Arabic language.
Furthermore, based on the classification of Ibn Mada al-Qurtubi among the opponents of secondary causes, and using Al-Suyuti's book Al-Iqtirah, we have mentioned and then examined criteria for detecting the corruption of secondary causes.
In explaining analogical causes, Al-Zajjaji provides an example as follows: if someone asks why the 'letters resembling the verb' (huruf mushabbahah bi-l-fi'l) grant 'nasb' to the noun and 'raf'' to the predicate, the answer is that they have acquired this characteristic due to their similarity to a transitive verb.
For this category of explanations, Ibn Mada mentions an example from Muhammad bin Yazid al-Mubarrad, who says regarding the cause of voweled the sakin nun of the feminine plural: because the letter before it was sakin, the meeting of two sakin letters occurred.
The circle of certain causes based on the criterion intended by Ibn Mada is very limited, and by placing strong analyses in the second category alongside lower-level analyses, we have effectively lowered their credibility; it can even be said that by separating them from the first rank of grammatical causes, he attempted to set them aside from the circle of explanations.
As Ibn Mada considers secondary causes to be invalid altogether because they are not useful in understanding the manner of speaking the Arabic language, and says they should be removed from grammar.
(
, 
, 
)
