چکیده:
The fracture between developed and developing states, emerged by unequal distribution of the riches of the earth in the last century, reflects the specifics of international development law. International development law is a means of regulating which allows states to choose their political, social and economic organization within the legal framework of sovereign equality and independence, and takestep towards development. International development law has played a key role in shaping and strengthening main concepts of international law. Each of these concepts deals with the highest human values on its own. What is logically considered is that power in international community must be shifted in favor of justice. It is obvious that in some cases this movement has paved the way for the realization of such an ideal, and in other cases it stopped in the middle of the road due to the special structure of the international society or has changed its path to power again and failed to reach global solidarity. This paper focuses on clarifying the image of justice as a failed issue in international relations, then by considering the declaration of the right to development conclude that the international community is determined to center development on human being while making the content of this development evolve law according to the altering status of international society.
خلاصه ماشینی:
With this distinction in mind, we will first discuss the actors on the scene of “power” after the era of decolonization, when the issue of development arose, from the defiance of Third World countries and their recourse to the concept of sovereignty and the principle of equal rights and, consequently, their political, economic, and social independence in managing affairs, from the efforts to curb power through recourse to a new economic order that demanded a change in the colonial system, which appeared economically unjust.
” The reason for this was that because in the sixties to eighties of the last century, developing countries had not been able to obtain the formal agreement of industrial states on certain issues and, as a result, the ground for concluding a treaty was not available, this time they used the “power” of their majority in international organizations and especially in the General Assembly of the United Nations and approved such principles.
The “planning” texts on which these demands and claims were based were first presented in the United Nations General Assembly and also in institutions directly established to address the affairs of developing countries, such as the Non-Aligned Movement, which operated from 1965 to 1975 and regularly held meetings until it finally managed to outline the framework of demands of the New International Economic Order.
(
, 
, 
)
