چکیده:
This paper investigates the nature of Absolutive case and the syntactic mechanisms underlying its licensing. To this end، two recent minimalist approaches to the syntactic derivation of ergative structure will be introduced. Drawing on evidence from the syntactic derivation of clauses with intransitive complex predicates in Kurdish، it will be established that the Absolutive case is checked by the head of the Tense Phrase (T°). Thus construed، the chain of argumentation in this paper favors an approach to ergative structure where Absolutive case is treated on a par with Nominative case.
خلاصه ماشینی:
95-113) Dr. Yadegar Karimi Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Kurdistan University 1 Date of article receipt: 30/5/90 Date of final acceptance: 30/8/90 Abstract This article examines the mechanisms involved in reviewing the absolute case on the object of a transitive clause and the subject of an intransitive clause in ergative construction.
Then, based on new evidence from the syntactic derivation of intransitive compound verbs in the past tense in Kurdish, and consequently, by examining the manner of reviewing the absolute case in these constructions, it is argued that approach (b) to ergative construction has greater empirical and theoretical adequacy, and this in turn is an attempt to provide a more natural syntactic derivation for ergative constructions.
absolutive Based on the theoretical assumptions in this article, which takes the later version of the Minimalist Program as presented in Chomsky (2007, 2008) as a criterion, the mechanism of reviewing agent and patient case is as follows: (Refer to the image on the page) Diagram (1) Therefore, in an agent-patient language, the agent case of the subject of both transitive and intransitive clauses is reviewed (assigned) by the tense head in the specifier position of the vP (verbal shell), while the patient case of the noun phrase object is reviewed by the head of the verbal shell.