چکیده:
This article first introduces an analytical overview of a branch of political science that has remained relatively unknown in Iran, and then discusses its potential achievements for Iranian society and especially political science researchers. Policy sciences are a reaction to the increasing demands of society and its public institutions from politicians to solve political, social, and administrative problems and crises. According to some thinkers, political science, by limiting itself to general discussions, has paid less attention to solving clear, objective, and everyday societal problems; however, with the invention of policy sciences within political science, this goal will be realized. The expansion of policy sciences will open the way for political science researchers in Iran, like in other countries where this field has developed, to applied research and governmental administrative affairs, and connect political science to the clear and everyday needs of society. Furthermore, a policy science researcher can be effective in removing ambiguity from some thoughts in present-day Iran and proposing clear executive discussions for the country.
خلاصه ماشینی:
” These studies enriched discussions on topics such as the nature of society, the role of government, and the rights and responsibilities of citizens and governments; however, the gap between theory and practice led researchers to seek ways to reconcile and homogenize political theory and policy-making, and to fill the existing void between abstract discussions and objective needs through empirical analysis of current government policies.
(3) In other words, on the one hand, the hands of statesmen and community managers are short of the hem of lofty sociological thoughts and wise politicians’ ideas – either because of the meager intellectual capacity of managers in interpreting the objective ideas of politicians, or because of the failure of wise politicians to come down from the high heaven of abstract thoughts and address the glaring material and practical problems of society and facilitate affairs – and on the other hand, two governments with partisan ideologies and political orientations Different governments in practice can either follow a specific policy or are forced to do so, and the terms “left” and “right,” which have different meanings in different times and places, do not have a fixed scientific and objective value.
He defines the characteristic of being problem-solving as linking political science to real-world issues 4 and not just remaining within academic boundaries, and finally, by calling policy sciences explicitly normative, “Lasswell” argues that policymaking should not insist on scientific objectivity 5, but rather accept that separating goals from tools, or values from techniques, is not possible in the study of government activities.
(
, 
, 
)
