چکیده:
The purpose of this article is to answer the question of what fundamental motivation leads humans to fight against the existing political order and engage in revolutionary action, using Hegel's world of thought. In this regard, Hegel's view on anthropology is first examined and the stages that the human mind goes through to reach self-awareness are explained. By understanding Hegel's view of humans and based on the process of "self-awareness" of humans in his thought, the motivation of humans to resort to revolutionary action becomes clear.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Unlike thinkers who have considered the motivation of man to engage in revolutionary uprisings as economic needs and material foundations, or pointed to the instinctive tendencies of man, Hegel seeks this motivation in man's desire to gain respect and dignity and to be recognized as a self-aware, thinking, and independent being in society.
These include sensory certainty, perception, understanding or reason, which are described below, stages that with their realization provide the ground for human self-awareness and give the essence and entity of man stability and strength.
From the point of view of believers in the method of sensory certainty, since in the discussion of knowledge, external objects are separate from our minds, alien to them and standing against them, they must be identified, purified of mental concepts and rational generalizations, and this is the most correct and reliable way to know the surroundings.
Overall, from Hegel's point of view, the work of cognition, science, and thought is only possible in a woven context of general and universal concepts that manifest in the phenomenon of language, and any identifying agent, scientist, and thinker who wants to ignore this reality in their work will face difficulty and, in fact, contradiction.
(17) C- Understanding or Intellect Sensory certainty sought to know a single and unmediated object, but since this knowledge was impossible, awareness reached the stage of perception and took its subject not as something single and simple but as a mixture of individuality and generality, and realized that truth is not in individuality but in generality.
(
, 
, 
)
