چکیده:
The present paper tries to review the two types of process approaches in Plato's method of theorizing. As a reading of Socrates and Parmenides debate, the first type of this approach is an attempt to show how the dialectical application of Socrates, which is observed in Plato's works, is manifested in the definition of ideas and their relationship to tangible objects. At each stage after the birth of the thesis, the strengths and weaknesses of the thesis are examined, the relevant synthesis is formed and the debate proceeds accordingly. The power of thought, reasoning, creativity, and discerning contradictions used in this debate, which gives rise to the debate and intensifies it, as well as the hidden direction that drives the debate within its framework can be seen as a process which in Plato's method (influenced by the teachings of Socrates) manifests itself for extracting truth from the human mind. Known today as process philosophy, another process approach of similar kind can be seen in Plato's works, especially in the way he views the issue of good, which seems to have not been addressed by thinkers throughout the history of philosophy.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The first type of this dynamism, as an interpretation of the dialogue between Socrates and Parmenides, is an effort to demonstrate how Socratic dialectic, as seen in Plato's works, is implemented in defining ideas and their relationship with sensible objects.
The power of thought, reasoning, creativity, and falsification employed in this dialogue, which causes the discussion to begin and branch out, and the hidden direction that moves the discussion within its framework, can be considered as a dynamism that manifests itself in Plato's method (under the teachings of Socrates) for extracting truth from the human mind.
Another dynamic approach, of the same nature as the philosophy known today as process philosophy, is observed in Plato's works, especially in his view of the Form of the Good, which seems to have been overlooked by thinkers throughout the history of philosophy.
It is worth noting that: first, based on the dialectical method, these objections do not attack this theory all at once, but rather enter step by step, and each leads to the refinement of the theory by Socrates; second, in the Parmenides treatise, the objections raised against the participation of sensibles from the Ideas have been raised, and then the separation of Ideas was addressed.
The first case of refutation In clause "c", we reached the conclusion that from Socrates' perspective, Ideas exist in themselves and for themselves, separate from sensible things.
(
, 
, 
)
