چکیده:
Understanding the nature of religious juridical subjects is one of the effective necessities of religious jurisprudence in making clear the religious precepts criteria. Both cleanliness and uncleanness are very important issues in the religious jurisprudence that understanding their nature from real and not real points of view may cause some basic changes in the field of cleanness and uncleanness. Now the question is whether cleanness and uncleanness are considered as real issues or nominal issues، what are the necessities and consequences of both views? Researching of the received religious percepts in the field of cleanness and uncleanness indicated that despite of lack of vividness in the nature of cleanliness and uncleanness from the viewpoint of real or nominal because of explicit reference of religious percepts criteria in the cases these proofs considered from high potential in proving and extracting of reality of cleanliness and uncleanness. The researcher not only considered the religious percepts in the field of cleanliness and uncleanness but also studied the criteria for religious percepts and concluded that cleanliness and uncleanness are a real affair which can be a matter of nominal religious percepts، and in that religious speeches they did consider cleanness and uncleanness for all things with attention to the real presence of both.
خلاصه ماشینی:
An examination of the Sharia evidences presented in this chapter indicates that despite the lack of explicit statement regarding their nature as real or conventional in these evidences, due to the explicit reference to the criteria of rulings in most cases, these evidences possess high capacity for the deduction and inference of the reality of purity and impurity.
In the following article, while defining real and conventional matters, with a general reference to the views of scholars and principleists regarding the nature of purity and impurity, some of the Sharia discourses and narrations in this field are investigated, and considering the content of these evidences and the discovery of the criteria of rulings, the reality of purity and impurity has been deduced and inferred.
3- A general look at the perspective of jurists regarding whether purity and impurity are conventional or real What is obtained from investigation and tracking in the works and writings of scholars is that this issue has not received much attention from them, and only a few of them, such as Sheikh Ansari in "Fara'id al-Usul," Muhaqqiq Na'ini in "Fawa'id al-Usul," Ayatollah Khoei in "Misbah al-Usul," Muhaqqiq Iraqi in "Nihayat al-Afkar," and Ayatollah Sayyid Muhammad Baqir Zanjani in "Mi'raj al-Usul," by entering into this issue, have expressed their views in this regard, the summary of which is as follows: 1- The first view is the view of Sheikh Ansari; from his perspective, purity and impurity belong to the category of external Sharia rulings and are placed among real matters.
(
, 
, 
)
