Fundamental flaws in the rational interpretation method of contemporary commentators with a focus on Tafsir al-Manar مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

ir Reason and Religion, Year 15, Number 29 (Autumn and Winter 2023)  156 ▪ Foundational Flaws in the Rational Interpretation Method of Contemporary Commentators with a Focus on Tafsir al-Manar 1- Introduction Reason, alongside authentic verses and narrations, is one of the sources for interpreting and understanding the Quran. 2-2-1- Interest-oriented attitude in non-ritual legislations Abduh and Rashid Rida, with a dual view toward acts of worship and the lawful and unlawful on one hand, and worldly matters such as political and judicial affairs on the other, due to the necessity of relying on religious texts and the lack of investigation into the ruling of intoxicants in the first domain, negate ijtihad and reasoning, and emphasize the permissibility of ijtihad based on opinion (ra'y) in the second domain for deriving what human worldly interests depend upon (Rashid Rida, Reason and Religion, Year 15, Number 29 (Autumn and Winter 2023)  160 ▪ Foundational flaws of the rational interpretation method of contemporary commentators with a focus on Tafsir al-Manar 1414: Vol. 12, 68). Reason and Religion, Year 15, Number 29 (Autumn and Winter 2023)  164 ▪ Fundamental flaws in the rational interpretation method of contemporary commentators with a focus on Tafsir al-Manar 1-3- Allegorical interpretations of the language of the Quran regarding metaphysical concepts and some Quranic stories Among contemporary commentators, Allameh Tabataba'i, Javadi Amoli, and Muhammad Abduh have interpreted some verses as allegories (Javadi Amoli, 1388: 429-432).