چکیده:
The aim of this study was to recontextualize the resistive economy as a behavioral system. This research was a qualitative project case study based on context or recontextualization and is placed among the basic researches based on its goal and has been done using thematic analysis method. The study population consisted of all the supreme leader’s statements in the scope of resistive economy and thematic analysis has been done based on recontextulization on these documents. In order to authenticate the validity of research data concepts such as credibility, trustworthiness, and defensibility have been used. Research findings indicate that recontextualizing the resistive economy as a behavioral system could be explained in the form of conceptual, structural, and functional themes. Henceforth, conceptual dimension includes components such as comprehending the concept of resistive economy, purpose, necessities, and strategies. In the structural dimension components such as strategic orientation, organizational design and cultural context are important. Finally, in functional dimension components including main activities (central), contextualizing activities and performance considerations are explained. According to the Supreme Leader's emphasis on the implementation of resistive economy pattern and the need for functional patterns application in order to save the country’s economy and on the other hand, due to the relative weakness of existing patterns in present research, practical implications of the findings have been discussed.
خلاصه ماشینی:
These dimensions can, within the text of the strategic approach and with appropriate leadership, serve as the basis for action to achieve the best functions of the resistance economy and provide favorable conditions for responsiveness, cohesion, and effectiveness of the country's economic system.
Given the aforementioned descriptions and also considering that from the perspective of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, one of the most important requirements of the resistance economy is its academic and scholarly clarification (2012/08/06); this research intends to examine and clarify the category of the resistance economy within the framework of a solid and actionable behavioral system using a re-conceptualization approach based on contextualization6.
Therefore, in order to achieve development goals at national, regional, and global levels and, on the other hand, to realize the requirements of the resistance economy, it should be possible to realize the pattern of organizational health, which includes the dimensions of accountability, cohesion, and effectiveness, be realized in this field.
On the other hand, the practicalization and application of the resistance economy model, until it is implemented without delay within a specific timeframe according to the commands of the Supreme Leader and, on the other hand, until functional considerations are taken into account for each of its clauses, cannot dynamically indicate the achievement of the desired goals, and the existing behavioral system cannot respond to the needs of society and guarantee the survival of the country's economic system.
(
, 
, 
)
