چکیده:
In the last two centuries, Muslim religious dissidents have criticized and refined the Islamic heritage and claimed to fight against superstitions. The criticisms and arguments of a group called those of Qurchr ('39') an,Quraniun, have received less attention from religious scholars. Since this group claims to fight against superstitions, many Shiite beliefs have been invalidated and rejected due to their conflict with the Qurchr ('39') an, including the critique of the Imamate of the Ahl al-Bayt. Relying on several verses of the Qurchr ('39') an, this movement has tried to challenge the theory of the Shiite Imamate and introduce it as a belief contrary to the Qurchr ('39') an. As some of them claim, citing verse 165 of Nisa, that the divine authority of the Imams is in contradiction with the meaning of this verse; Because in this verse, God has introduced only the prophets as His proofs. As a result, the authority of the Ahl al-Bayt may not be taken as true. This article tries to examine the strength or weakness of quoting this verse in the critique of Imamate. This research indicates that this verse does not signify their claim in any way, and the misunderstanding of those called Qurchr ('39') aniyun is the source of such a great error.
خلاصه ماشینی:
An Interpretive Study of the Reliance on Verse 165 of An-Nisa in Denying the Authority of the Ahl al-Bayt^ 1 Hamed Dejabad 2 Mohsen Moosavand 3 Abstract Muslim religious dissidents in the last two centuries have engaged in criticizing and refining the Islamic heritage, claiming to fight against superstitions.
This movement has attempted, by adhering to several verses of the Quran, to challenge the theory of the Shiite Imamate and present it as a belief contrary to the Quran; for instance, some of them, by citing verse 165 of An-Nisa, claim that the divine authority of the Imams is in contradiction with the meaning of this verse, because in this verse, God has introduced only the prophets as His proofs (hujjat).
As is clearly evident, the content of the above article has a fundamental difference from the following writing; because in the present writing, focus is placed only on one of Borqei's objections in denying the authority of the Ahl al-Bayt^ by citing verse 165 of Surah An-Nisa, and an attempt has been made to provide various constructive and critical responses to this objection.
It is clear that such an implication would not be acceptable, but if it is answered that after the coming of every prophet, the proof is completed for his people, this would be the same analysis we mentioned and has no connection to Borqei's claim in denying the authority of the pure Imams.
(
, 
, 
)
