چکیده:
The issue of the conflict between science and religion has always been one of the most challenging topics among philosophers of science and religion. One of the most important aspects of this issue, which has received less attention, is its epistemological dimensions. In this research, using an explanatory-analytical method, we seek to answer the question: can a solution be provided from an epistemological perspective to overcome the challenge of science and religion? In this article, an attempt is made to first contest opposing and rival theories and then explain how this issue occurs. One of the most important opposing theories is the monopoly of empirical knowledge, which faces many flaws such as the invalidity of mathematical propositions, unavoidable assumptions in scientific theories, the paradox of empiricists' claims, and the limited domain of empirical knowledge. Theories such as the thesis of the independence of science and religion and the methodological pluralism of sciences also do not possess the necessary effectiveness to resolve the conflict; because they severely limit the realm of religion and call into question the complementarity of science and religion. However, epistemological pluralism, through the precise distinction and identification of scientific subjects, can fundamentally resolve the conflict between science and religion, although it does not deny primitive and initial conflicts that are rationally and scientifically justifiable.
خلاصه ماشینی:
144 The alleged conflict between science and religion can influence individuals' attitudes toward religion, science, and the universe 144 be placed and lead to a feeling of bias against religion in worldly affairs; therefore, finding appropriate solutions ــــــــــ Quarterly to resolve this conflict can significantly contribute to the development of knowledge in both the domains of religion and science; ـــــــــــ Scientific-Research Furthermore, examining this issue can help strengthen dialogue and interaction between religious scholars and scientists.
This thought, although it poses a kind of conflict between science and religion, in this conflict, on the contrary, exclusivism 147 147 A critique and investigation of Nasser al-Qafari's view on the emergence of empirical, religious knowledge possesses representational value and in case of conflict with scientific- ــــــــــ Quarterly ـــــــــــ empirical, religion is predominant.
), 155 155 A review and examination of Nasser al-Qafari's view on the emergence of have serious problems; because both science and religion, from an epistemological perspective, have objective or ــــــــــ Quarterly ـــــــــــrealist claims regarding human life and its beyond, and if we hold to the epistemological independence of science and religion, Scientific-Research although we escape the challenge of their conflict, fundamentally no way remains for dialogue between science and religion.
Therefore, considering epistemological pluralism, if something is understood with certainty from the religious sources of Islam, it will not have a serious and fundamental conflict with facts that are definitively proven by rational or empirical sciences 159 159 A critique and examination of Nasser al-Qafari's view on the emergence was obtained (Misbah Yazdi, 1375: 16-18).
(
, 
, 
)
