چکیده:
In this writing, the author intends to identify and discover the roots and factors creating social, cultural, and political disruption, and to find a remedial strategy and practical solution to combat it. In fact, the present research is a diagnostic action for phenomena such as tradition-breaking, lawlessness, corruption-seeking, and anti-conformity in the new generation, and other manifestations of this kind, which bring about the existence of cultural disruption in society. The author, in order to gain awareness, has inevitably sought to discover the causes creating it, which are mainly found in three areas: political, economic, and cultural, although the subject itself is a cultural matter. In the political dimension, the potential power of pluralism, due to neglect of its control, can emerge as a dangerous epidemic and become the source of social disruptions. Also, unconscious and crude management in the administration of society, which leads to discrimination, injustice, and pressure on the people, is another factor. Furthermore, in the political field, the phenomenon of pluralism is considered a potential factor for disruption in political philosophy, but the existence of two important factors in the current system of Iran prevents its emergence: one is the structure of society based on three classes with a middle-class majority, and the other is the institution of Velayat-e Faqih; these two, along with other requirements for social consensus, have a significant impact in this regard. In the economic dimension as well, the aforementioned potential, due to the assistance of cultural liberalism, splits society into two terrible tragic parts: either extremely poor or extremely wealthy, which drives society towards disintegration and ruin. The cultural liberalism mentioned is a factor in the cultural dimension for the loosening of bonds and the breaking of ties within society. The inconsistency between words and actions, the distancing of managers from the masses, and neglect of societal issues and the new generation, etc., are among the factors in this field. The author has attempted, using religious teachings, to provide strategies in each relationship to combat the adverse effects of disruption, which are addressed in the middle of the discussion and at the end of the speech.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Also, in the political field, the phenomenon of pluralism has been considered a potent factor for disruption in political philosophy, but the existence of two important factors in the current system of Iran prevents its emergence: one is the structure of society based on three classes with a middle-class majority, and the other is the institution of Velayat-e Faqih; these two, in addition to other requirements of social consensus, have a significant impact in this regard.
The challenge that faces society due to the existence of such a characteristic (political, economic, and cultural pluralism) is that in neglected managements, the balance of the diversified forces of society is disrupted, and following that, a disruption arises between the groups and sectors of society, some of whose consequences are indicated below: The Bipartition of Society, a Political-Economic Factor of Disruption Aristotle may be the first person who, in political theorizing to protect society from division and social disruption, points to the three-class basis of human society.
In this governmental advice, Imam (peace be upon him) refers to two important consequences, namely the rupture of the relationship between the society's management hierarchy and the people, and the relationships between social groups themselves, which have two origins: political and economic.
Although the subject of discussion is itself a cultural matter, like any other cultural issue, it has roots in other spheres such as political and economic; it also has growth factors that can be identified through the behavioral and action-based manifestations of individuals and groups.
(
, 
, 
)
