چکیده:
After the passing of the Prophet (PBUH), a group of Ansar gathered at Saqifah and discussed the leadership of the community and the appointment of the Prophet's successor. It seems that raising such discussions by the Ansar at those times was a reaction to certain actions of the Muhajirun. This is because they had discovered through various signs that a group of Muhajirun intended to seize power, and the Ansar intended to prevent this by gathering at Saqifah. However, what compelled the Ansar to take this ill-considered action was fear combined with competition with the Quraysh. Although the services of the Ansar in helping to establish Islam during the era of the Great Prophet (PBUH) can also be among the reasons for their attention to the government. Furthermore, by reviewing historical texts related to Saqifah, it must be said that many prominent supporters of Imam Ali (AS), such as Jabir ibn Abdullah al-Ansari, were not present at Saqifah. The goal of this research is to investigate the various aspects of the reasons for the gathering of the Ansar at Saqifah and to analyze them, using primary historical texts and the analysis of new research conducted.
خلاصه ماشینی:
He accused the Ansar of conspiring to usurp the government and seize the succession of the Prophet (صلی الله علیه و آله) and to deprive the Muhajirun of their rights, and in this way, he justified the legitimacy of the developments at Saqifah.
Furthermore, the news of the Ansar's gathering at the Saqifah was given secretly only to Abu Bakr and Umar, and while they were rushing toward the Saqifah, the people present in the house of the Prophet (صلی الله علیه و آله) were unaware of this matter, and Umar and Abu Bakr did not share it with the general Muslim population, or at least with the leaders of the community, so that if there were any evil in it, they could devise a solution through consultation with others.
Given the fear of the Ansar due to the killing of the leaders of Quraysh in the wars of the Prophet (صلی الله علیه و آله), in this case, one must see how the Quraysh would have treated Imam Ali(as), who alone had killed half of the Quraysh casualties at Badr (The History of the Transformation of the State in Islam, p.
The absence of prominent Ansar supporters of Imam Ali (عليه السلام) in Saqifah Although the view of the Ansar towards Imam Ali (عليه السلام) was positive, and some primary historical sources have reported their inclination to pledge allegiance to the Imam after the passing of the Prophet (صلی الله علیه و آله) (Al-Saqifah wal-Fadak, p.
(
, 
, 
)
