Dialogue with Professor Alidoust; Methodology of Ijtihad گفتگو و مصاحبه

خلاصه ماشینی:

In the school of the Usulis, meaning those who believe in the principles of jurisprudence (Usul al-Fiqh), we mainly have two schools: one we call the technical-oriented and minor-major (sughra-kubra) school, which possesses a methodology and approach that looks at the proofs; if the evidences have a valid chain of transmission (sanad) and indicate a clear meaning (dalalah), he issues a fatwa, and if they lack sanad or dalalah, he sets them aside and turns to the practical principles (usul al-amaliyya); meaning, with a very disciplined, school-based, and classical derivation using minor and major premises, and ultimately dealing with pure Usuli rules. When you look at his jurisprudence, you see that if a verse or a narration is reliable and has an apparent meaning (zahir al-dalalah), he issues a fatwa, and if not, he sets them all aside and turns to the practical principles. ' I think that with these explanations and examples, which exist extensively in the Sheikh's jurisprudential books, you have realized what the goal of an author in the issue of 'the methodology of ijtihad,' his motivation, and naturally, the fruits of this work could be? " So, if someone wants to bring this discussion within the Eighteen Principles and bring a massive book titled "The Eighteen Principles of Jurisprudence" here, there is no problem, but the term Eighteen Principles has no relation to this issue of methodology. " For example, the discussions you study in the principles of jurisprudence teach you the method of derivation. Of course, I did not explain the method there, but it is included in the discussion of the methodology of ijtihad.