چکیده:
The uprising of Ashura has been constantly the focus of scientific debates among various Shiite schools. The works developed in this context reflect the intellectual foundations and beliefs of the authors of these works. The current research was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of the intellectual foundations of Hojjatiya Society on their perception of the Karbala uprising, based on the book, Mystery of Ashura, which is a work attributed to this group. The results of this research carried out through the descriptive-analytical method and based on knowledge producing systems out of the ontological and epistemological foundations accepted by the association, clarify that Hojjatiya Society has completely removed the knowledge and enlightenment of the Ashura uprising from the limit of ordinary human sciences and it does not propose anything other than accepting this part of the life of Seyyed al-Shohda (A.S) to understand the various aspects of his movement.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The present research, aimed at understanding the extent of the influence of the Hojjatieh Association's intellectual foundations on their perception of the Karbala uprising, has been conducted based on the book 'The Secret of Ashura' — a work attributed to this group.
The results of this research, which was carried out using a descriptive-analytical method and based on knowledge production systems derived from ontological and epistemological foundations accepted by the Association, show that the Hojjatieh Association has absolutely removed the recognition and explanation of the Ashura uprising from the realm of ordinary human sciences and suggests no way other than the devotional acceptance of this part of the life of the Sayyid al-Shuhada (Master of Martyrs) to reach an understanding of the various dimensions of His movement.
The Hojjatieh Association, by accepting the theories of Sheikh Mahmoud Halabi, who was influenced by his teacher Mirza Mahdi Isfahani, has argued for the distinction between divine sciences and human sciences by adopting the theory that the subject and meanings of words are external and objective realities, not mental concepts.
Therefore, Mohammad Hashemi, by separating the divine and human aspects in the Infallible Imams and the necessity of not mixing the rulings of these two, considers the aspect of understanding the nature of the uprising of Sayyid al-Shuhada to be unattainable 4 and believes that this aspect of their conduct should only be accepted as devotional.
(
, 
, 
)
