چکیده:
The main issue of this article is to explain the ontological and legislative status of women's jealousy regarding the issue of polygamy from the perspective of narrations. Narrations in this regard have addressed both the realm of the existence or non-existence of the aforementioned jealousy and the realm of legislation and the impermissibility of adhering to its effects and consequences. The goal of this writing is to recognize a corner of women's personality alongside providing an analytical view of the relationship between women's jealousy and the issue of polygamy. This article, using a descriptive-analytical method, examines the meaning of these narrations—which are governed by a type of primary conflict—and has reached the conclusion that they collectively indicate 'the ontological proof of jealousy in the nature of women alongside the legislative negation of adhering to its effects and consequences'; meaning that although women, by their creative nature, feel jealousy toward their spouses due to love, if they apply this jealousy regarding the issue of legitimate remarriage, they have in fact become afflicted with a kind of 'envy'.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Using a descriptive-analytical method, this article examines the meaning of these narrations—which are subject to a kind of primordial contradiction—and has reached the conclusion that collectively they indicate "the ontological proof of jealousy in the nature of women alongside the legislative negation of adhering to its effects and consequences"; this means that although women, in their creative nature, feel jealousy toward their spouses due to love, if they exercise this jealousy regarding the issue of legitimate remarriage, they have in fact become afflicted with a kind of "envy.
The article "The Role of Femininity in the Moral Category of Jealousy" written by Rahim Dehqan Simkani, the book "Jealousy and its Pathologies" written by Mahmoud Akbari, and the section on gender differences from the book "Islam and Gender Differences" written by Bostan Najafi can also be mentioned as the background of this writing; however, none of these sources have had a detailed look at the collection of narrations raised in this chapter and have not addressed the question of the ontological and legislative status of this description from the perspective of narrations and, ultimately, the derivation of a unified meaning from the sum of them.
Therefore, the aforementioned contradiction is eliminated, and the collection of narrations can be considered indicative of "the ontological affirmation of jealousy and its legislative negation"; meaning that although there is jealousy in the nature and disposition of women toward their husbands, Muslim women—who possess abundant faith—struggle against this matter and, due to submission to the divine law and the realization of the social benefits of polygamy, do not engage in opposition to their husband—which in fact leads to a type of envy.
(
, 
, 
)
