چکیده:
Among three opposition groups, including Islamist, leftists and nationalists, at the second Pahlavi’s era, it was just the Islamists that successfully took the leadership by taking advantage of social assets and established their desired political system. Using official and unofficial relation networks, such as mosques, religious gatherings and schools as social assets as well as the employment of strong beliefs and values, such as Entedar, as powerful cooperational norms, Islamists could gain people’s political trust and withorganizing public protests, they could practically lead the revolution and finally establish their desired political system namely the Islamic republic of Iran.
خلاصه ماشینی:
For example, the existence of social networks such as mosques, religious organizations, and religious schools during the Pahlavi era were considered among the social capitals at the disposal of the Islamists, which, while playing an important role in the formation of the revolution, were exclusively at the disposal of the Islamist current and, above all, they were able to utilize them toward their own goals.
The role of social capital in the efficiency of democratic institutions in the northern regions of Italy Based on this, and based on Putnam's theory, regarding the role of social capital in the success of the Islamist movement, we must analyze it in this way: one of the major reasons for the success of the Islamist movement as a successful opposition group to the government—which was able to take leadership of the government's opponents during the final years of the Pahlavi monarchy and replace the political system after the victory of the revolution—was the Islamists' possession of strong networks of relationships and firm cooperative norms, which subsequently created the necessary trust for people's cooperation.
The role of social capital in the success of the Islamist movement (1975-2031) According to the theory of this research, due to possessing strong networks of relationships and having cooperative norms, the Islamist movement was able to build trust among the people much more strongly than the other two movements and claim the leadership of the opponents of the Pahlavi regime.
(
, 
, 
)
