چکیده:
Ibn al-Farid and Hafez share many commonalities. However, wine in the lexicon of these two masters is a secret, a beloved mystery that each interprets and explains from their own perspective. Ibn al-Farid's Khamriyah is an independent poem on this subject, and it is also mentioned in the Divan of Hafez, where intoxication, continuity, and wine are mentioned to the utmost extent. The many similarities in the social and cultural conditions in which Hafez and Ibn al-Farid lived, as well as the prosperity of Sufism in that era and its related symbolic language, have led to the closeness of their poetic language, especially regarding wine as a symbol of divine love. What this article addresses is the influence of Ibn al-Farid on Hafez's Khamriyah poems. Differences in their perspectives are also clearly palpable in the poems of both, which have been addressed to some extent using a comparative method.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Due to necessity, at first, an attempt has been made to briefly state the life history of these two greats, and then a comparison is made between the historical eras of those two, namely the seventh and eighth centuries AH, especially regarding the growth of mysticism and Sufism during this time; also, some viewpoints of the two poets have been examined based on their poems, and finally, verses from Ibn al-Farid's Khamriyah have been compared with verses from the Divan of Hafiz.
has influenced Sufis of his era until today (Joya Jahambakhsh, Translation and Composition of Jami's Khamriyyah by Ibn al-Farid) Hafez Shirazi Shams al-Din Muhammad Hafez is one of the great geniuses of the human world who entered the stage of existence in Shiraz at the beginning of the eighth century AH.
The pleasure of wine and the intoxication resulting from it is not the goal in Ibn al-Farid's poetry; rather, he places it as a symbol and metaphor at the service of Divine Love, employing it as a language to describe the state of ecstasy, selflessness, and the intoxication arising from the attraction of the Truth (Nizam Tehrani, 1383: 57).