چکیده:
The purpose of the present study is to review principles and methods of good governance in the Islamic revolution with an approach to the idea of the Supreme Leader. In this regard, the compatibility of this idea is compared to the current governance method in the Islamic revolution and the ideology of Wilāyt-e Faqih. The method of study is content analysis and the results indicate that the contents and components written in the theory of good governance are not in contradiction with the ideas of the Supreme Leader, but rather the theory of good governance in his view is based on some principles which can be achieved through self-improvement, society-improvement, and government-improvement. This issue can lead the Islamic Republic in the second step of the Islamic revolution to a more favorable and efficient place.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The research method is content analysis, and the results indicate that the concepts and components included in the theory of desirable governance do not conflict or contradict the thoughts of the Supreme Leader; however, from his perspective, the theory of desirable governance is based on principles that will be possible through self-improvement, society-building, and state-building, and this very matter can bring the system of the Islamic Republic to a more desirable and efficient position in the second step of the Islamic Revolution.
It seems that the concepts and components included in the theory of desirable governance do not conflict or contradict the thoughts of the Supreme Leader; however, from his perspective, the theory of desirable governance is based on principles that will be possible through self-improvement, society-building, and state-building, and this very matter can bring the system of the Islamic Republic to a more desirable and efficient position in the second step of the Islamic Revolution.
Given these fundamental critiques made against the theoretical foundations of good governance as the dominant model in the Western world, the Supreme Leader states: The Western model for development is an unsuccessful model; because despite Western countries achieving wealth and power, human values and spirituality have been lost in these societies (Nazemi Ardakani, 1388: p.
(
, 
, 
)
