چکیده:
The present article examines one of the historical issues of the Holy Quran called 'Tahrif' (distortion). In this writing, an attempt has been made to first address the concept of 'Tahrif', and then examine this subject in two interpretations, 'Al-Manar' and 'Fi Zilal al-Quran', using Quranic, narrational, rational, historical evidence, and the miracles of the Quran regarding the non-distortion of the Holy Quran. Ultimately, what was obtained is that Rashid Rida, among the mentioned reasons, has relied on the Quranic reason ('the verse of preservation'), the narrational reason or Prophetic Sunnah, historical evidence, and new and innovative reasons such as legal rulings and similarities, rhetorical miracle, and abrogation and non-distortion, in defense of the non-distortion of the Holy Quran. However, Sayyid Qutb, in comparison to Rashid Rida, has paid more attention to Quranic reasons to prove the non-distortion of the Quran; in addition to the 'preservation' verse, he has also relied on the 'negation of falsehood' verse and has raised other reasons such as the issue of the miracle of the Quran and historical evidence from the protectors of the Quran during the time of revelation, and has ultimately benefited from one of Rashid Rida's new reasons, namely the rhetorical miracle. It is worth mentioning that this research has been conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, with a comparative approach and through library tools.
خلاصه ماشینی:
An Inquiry into the Incorruptibility of the Holy Quran (A Comparative Study of the Views of Sayyid Qutb and Rashid Rida) 1 Zohreh Narimani 2 Azar Hosseini (Date of Receipt: 94/7/6; Date of Acceptance: 95/1/23) Abstract The present article examines one of the topics in the history of the Holy Quran called "Tahrif" (corruption).
In the end, it was found that among the mentioned proofs, Rashid Rida has relied on Quranic evidence (the verse of preservation), narrational evidence or the Prophetic Sunnah, historical testimony, and new and innovative proofs such as Muhkam and Mutashabih, rhetorical miracle (I'jaz Bayani), abrogation (Naskh), and non-corruption, in defending the non-corruption of the Holy Quran.
However, Sayyid Qutb has paid more attention to Quranic evidence compared to Rashid Rida to prove the non-corruption of the Quran, and in addition to the verse of "preservation," he has also held onto the verse of "negating falsehood.
Therefore, Sayyid Qutb and Rashid Rida, in harmony with other mentioned scholars, emphasize the preservation and protection of the Holy Quran from corruption based on Quranic evidence and widespread consensus.
" (Rashid Rida, 1990: 8/173) Sayyid Qutb has not mentioned any opinion regarding the non-distortion of the Quran in the commentary of this verse.
Therefore, it seems that Rashid Rida, like other scholars, believes in the non-distortion of the Quran based on narrative evidence and the Prophetic Sunnah, and perhaps Sayyid Qutb does not hold such an opinion.
(
, 
, 
)
