چکیده:
The local governments of Gilan, Daylam, and Mazandaran formed relationships based on preserving their own existence simultaneously with the formation of the Alavid government of Tabaristan. In this process, different behaviors emerged from the Bavandids, Paduspanids, and Jastanis. Sometimes confrontation and sometimes cooperation and tolerance were their behavioral methods, and the goal of all of them was to preserve sovereignty and permanence; therefore, by striving for their political existence, they worked to preserve territory, government, and population. Historical data indicates the methods of establishing relationships and how they were used for the continuity of power. In response to the question regarding the reason for establishing contact between the local governments of the region and the Alavids of Tabaristan, this research, by explaining historical sources, addresses the preservation of sovereignty as an important reason for the connection, which was implemented in different ways by various governments. Seeking help by the Jastanis, dual behavior by the Paduspanids, and confrontation by the Bavandids were the dominant behaviors of each against the Alavids of Tabaristan.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Local governments (Bavandids, Paduspanids, and Jastaniyan), Alavids of Tabaristan, Zaydis, Gilan, Daylam, Mazandaran Introduction The simultaneous presence of political and religious institutions in the geographical area south of the Caspian Sea shaped a specific type of interaction and behavioral pattern in history.
Bav, the son of Shapur, the founder of this dynasty, served Khosrow Parviz, and after the collapse of the Sassanid government, his children and descendants in this In contrast, the Zaydis, who after the uprising of Zayd ibn Ali ibn al-Husayn (AS) during the Umayyad period and with uprisings such as the uprising of Nafs al-Zakiyya and the uprising of al-Fakh during the Abbasid period (Isfahani, 1339: 170/2-175), had stood in opposition to the central power of the Islamic world and harbored dreams of the Caliphate, made migration to areas susceptible to the call (da'wah) their profession; by utilizing the opportunity that became available to them in the aforementioned region, they sowed the seeds of a call that transformed into a governmental structure.
Occasional and short-term alignments with the Alavids of Tabaristan were also not for the purpose of gaining legitimacy, but were planned out of necessity and effort for organizing future confrontations with them; for example, after the dominance of Hasan bin Zayd over the region, Qarin bin Shahriyar, who faced the strength of the presence of the new group and serious support from other kings and the people, was, he was forced to outwardly express friendship and alliance with the Zaydis, but in contrast, he had serious involvement with the forces of the Caliphate against them (Ibn Isfandiyar, n.