چکیده:
Although the philosophy of history, like many human sciences, has evidence and even roots in traditional Islamic Eastern knowledge, it has been organized as an independent branch of knowledge in the West and subsequently entered Eastern lands. The current state of knowledge in Iran, particularly Islamic, given the necessities and contexts of transformation in the humanities, has provided an opportunity to propose a new schema in the field of the philosophy of history. After reviewing the most important topics of the two main branches of the philosophy of history, namely the theoretical philosophy of history and the critical philosophy of history, this article addresses the deficiencies of existing classifications and then presents its reasoned proposal for the indigenization of the topics of the philosophy of history influenced by religious teachings in five main axes as follows: meta-history philosophy, philosophy of the set of historical events, philosophy of the historical event, philosophy of historical science, and philosophy of historical reports.
خلاصه ماشینی:
This article, after reviewing the most important discussions of the two main branches of the philosophy of history, namely the theoretical philosophy of history and the critical philosophy of history, addresses the deficiencies in the existing classification and then presents its reasoned proposal for the indigenization of the discussions of the philosophy of history influenced by religious teachings across five main axes: the philosophy of metahistory, the philosophy of the set of historical events, the philosophy of the historical event, the philosophy of the science of history, and the philosophy of historical reports.
He also reported the most important critical philosophy of history in four axes as follows: history and other types of knowledge, reality and truth in history (the status of evidence and documents), historical objectivity (impartiality, bias, etc.
The Scientific Nature of History The issue that Aristotle did not include history in his classification of sciences has become the source of discussions regarding the scientific nature of history 2 and is still considered one of the prominent and common topics in the critical philosophy of history.
The Problem of Meaning in History Another emerging topic in the critical philosophy of history is the problem of meaning, which addresses issues such as methods of text reading and the discovery and expression of the conventional meaning of historical texts in the past and present, in accordance with linguistic turns and the uniformity of meaning, the contexts of text and meaning, the intentions of the creator of the historical text, and also the meaning of actions and events in history, both for the individuals playing roles in them and for the direct and indirect observers.
(
, 
, 
)
