چکیده:
Abu Khadija Salim bin Makram, who is also known as Abu Salama, is among the narrators whose reliability has been a subject of conflicting opinions among scholars of Rijal. The existence of important jurisprudential narrations that, if Salim bin Makram is deemed reliable, would be characterized as authentic, as well as similar names that sometimes cause confusion with Salim bin Makram—leading to the weakening of certain chains of narration and even the weakening of Salim himself—highlights the importance of further investigating the Rijal status of this narrator. This research, based on Rijal data, careful examination of the chains of hadith, and considering similar names, has concluded that in resolving this conflict, the possibility that Sheikh deviated from weakening him, given that his reference to moderation (ta'dil) is not definitive, is worth consideration. Regardless of the alleged internal conflict in Sheikh's statements, the requirements of 'reconciliation' (jam') and 'preference' (tarjih) necessitate the authentication of Salim; however, it is more accurate to say that Salim is 'thiqa' (trustworthy), because Sheikh's weakening stems from treating Salim bin Makram and Salim bin Abi Salama as one and the same. Consequently, Sheikh's weakening of Salim bin Makram is not acceptable, and Najashi's authentication remains without opposition.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The Role of Similar Names in the Conflict between the Views of Najashi and Sheikh Tusi Regarding Salim bin Makram 1 Elaheh Shahpasand Date of Receipt: 1393/07/15 Date of Approval: 1394/08/18 Abstract Abu Khadija Salim bin Makram, who is also known as Abu Salama Makni, is among the narrators whose reliability (وثاقت) has been a subject of conflicting opinions among scholars of Rijal.
This research, considering Rijal data, scrutiny of the chains of hadith, and taking similar names into account, has reached this conclusion: that in resolving this conflict, the possibility of the Sheikh deviating from weakening (tadh'if), given the non-definitive nature of his recourse to validation (ta'dil), is worthy of consideration.
Keywords: Conflict, Jarh and Ta'dil, Abu Salama Salim bin Makram, Similar Names, Najashi, Sheikh Tusi Introduction Based on certain principles of Usul, chain authenticity has always played a significant role in the acceptance or rejection of narrations within the jurisprudential investigations of Imami scholars.
Abu Khadija Salim bin Makram, who is also known as Abu Salama, is among the narrators whose reliability has been a subject of conflicting opinions among Rijal scholars; the importance of further investigating the reliability of this individual and determining the most correct solution for resolving this conflict is twofold: 1 - For example, see: Rostami and Zare, "Fazl bin Shadhan Nishapuri in the Mirror of Distinguishing Rijal Commonalities," Quarterly Kitab Qayyim, No. 1, p.
137) Conclusion Abu Salama Salim bin Makram is among the narrators about whom conflicting statements regarding his jarh and ta'dil (criticism and authentication) have been reported.
(
, 
, 
)
