چکیده:
The religious scholars' society is one of the main elements of the Ta'zi'ah and the most important one, and by studying the discursive space of the religious scholars community, changes can be made in this regard. The main purpose of the research is to analyze the discourse governing the religious scholars community and how the dominant discourse on the religious scholars community was to promote ritualism in Ta'ziyeh. In the study of the approach of religious scholars in Hossein Ta'zieh, Robert Mortene's theory of rituals of worship has been used. The research method is the type of qualitative research and the applied technique is the discourse analysis technique. In the study of the concepts of the analysis of the discourse of Lacla and Mouffe and in the study of the causal nature of this approach, the analysis of the discourse "Norman Frecklass" has been used. . The findings of the research show that in the discourse governing the community of religious scholars, in comparison with the past, there has been a ritualistic and unusual approach, and it seems that the continuation of this discursive process by religious scholars, itself, promotes religious ritualism in Will be tainted.
خلاصه ماشینی:
" The articulation of sub-signifiers such as the weak presence of scholars in the heart of society, the deficiency of speech content (which is often non-fundamental and aimed solely at expressing the objectives of the Ashura event and not its realistic introduction, sometimes even taking on political legitimacy), the lack of popular acceptance compared to before, and the existence of certain financial dependencies indicate the movement of religion from a people-oriented and moderate perspective toward an instrumental, opportunistic, and non-conventional perspective, where the dominance of this discourse, through "reducing questioning in society" and "changing local rituals," has led to the promotion of ritualism.
Since one of the manifestations and appearances of "non-secular" religion is the incorrect fusion of religion and politics, therefore, the various types of this fusion have been addressed, and then, based on the findings and the central signifier of the discourse governing the community of religious scholars, we will state which of these states that discourse is moving towards.
Detailed grouping of signifiers such as weak presence, deficiency in the content of speeches, and the decrease in the popular acceptance of religious scholars, indicates an incomplete and unacceptable positioning and establishment in the fusion of the two institutions of religion and politics from 277 them and the movement towards a non-secular religion, in a way that in the social mind, it has been expressed as the religious elites seeking safety from the people.
(
, 
, 
)
