چکیده:
After the demise of the Prophet (pbuh), the Arab rulers continued the tradition of the Prophet by appointing a successor. Thus, an epistemological epistemology and system was created with the focus on the foundations of the legitimacy of power in Islam, and many works were formed with this approach. From within these works, discourses were produced in the society and a special definition of the foundations of the legitimacy of the government was presented.One of the most important scenes in this confrontation is the confrontation between Ibn Taymiyyah and Al-Ulama Hali, which in Al-Minhaj Al-Sunnah and Al-Minhaj Al-Karama about the Imamate of Imam Ali (as), an issue that continued for centuries in the form of deep theoretical challenges between them. Identifying the political discourses of the Islamic society in the seventh century AH, according to Foucault's analytical model, requires referring to the archives of that historical period. For this purpose, the sum of documents and evidences,
خلاصه ماشینی:
Critique and Evaluation of the Imamate Discourse in the Confrontation of Ibn Taymiyyah and Allamah al-Hilli in Minhaj al-Sunnah and Minhaj al-Karama 1 Maliheh Ghanadian1, Mahboobeh Esmaeili2, Mirza Mohammad Hassani3 1.
com Abstract The aim of the present research is to analyze the discourse of Imamate in the political thought of Allamah al-Hilli and Ibn Taymiyyah so that by highlighting their weaknesses and perspectives, based on reason, the Book, and Sunnah, a rational theory of Islam regarding political legitimacy can be guided.
Therefore, using Michel Foucault's discourse analysis method to express the similarities and differences between the two perspectives, it was shown that Ibn Taymiyyah, due to confusion in the concept of Imamate, has not been successful in theorizing.
Critique and evaluation of the Imamate discourse in the confrontation of Ibn Taymiyyah and Allamah al-Hilli in Minhaj al-Sunnah and Minhaj al-Karama using Michel Foucault's method.
Introduction In the present research, in order to recognize the theoretical foundations of the legitimacy of power in Islam, the discourse of Ibn Taymiyyah and Allamah al-Hilli has been analyzed so that through this way, it can be determined: which political discourses were dominant in the Islamic society during the late 7th and early 8th centuries AH?
Conclusion The present research has analyzed the discourse of Imamate in the political thought of Allamah al-Hilli and Ibn Taymiyyah to highlight their weaknesses and perspectives, aiming to provide guidance toward a rational theory of Islam regarding political legitimacy based on reason, the Book, and Sunnah.
(
, 
, 
)
