چکیده:
The defense of the Iranian nation in the imposed war is one of the examples of defensive jihad. Imam Khomeini, as a jurist and religious authority, led the Holy Defense. This research attempts to analyze and explain the jurisprudential views of Imam Khomeini regarding the Holy Defense; accordingly, the rulings and issues of defensive jihad have been examined from the perspective of jurists, and under each of the issues and rulings, the jurisprudential views of Imam Khomeini in the Holy Defense have been analyzed and investigated. Issues such as the precedence of defense over other obligations and the obligation of defense for all Muslims have been raised. The research method in this study is descriptive-analytical, and it can be said from the findings of this research that: Imam Khomeini has operationalized the discussions of Fiqh al-Jihad, and his views in the Holy Defense are completely robust and documented, based on Jauhari jurisprudence, and theoretically align with the famous views of Imami jurists.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In the present research, after explaining the proofs for the obligation of defensive jihad, the issues and rulings related to this jihad are described in Shia jurisprudential books, and in each of the presented discussions, the jurisprudential views of Imam Khomeini in the Holy Defense are also stated.
D) Reason (Aql) Some jurists, in explaining the proofs for the obligation of defensive jihad, have approached the rational proof as follows: Reason issues a definitive ruling; namely, the necessity of preventing that which becomes a source of corruption and destruction of life, honor, or property (Sabzawari, 1413, Vol. 15: 101).
Muhaqqiq Iraqi, after stating the prohibition of war during the sacred months and in the Haram, writes: This prohibition is specific to Jihad in its narrowest sense (offensive Jihad), due to the specificity of the evidence toward this Jihad; however, in defensive Jihad, whenever the enemy attacks, defense is obligatory due to the generality of the evidence for the obligation of defense, in addition to the fact that preserving the foundation of Islam and Muslims is more important than respecting time and place (Iraqi, 1414, Vol. 4: 320).
Another example of the conflict between obligatory defense and prohibitions, and the precedence of defense, is cooperation with a tyrannical ruler; while jurists have considered cooperation with a tyrannical ruler to be prohibited, regarding defensive Jihad, if the defense of Islamic territory depends on cooperating with him, they have permitted it; however, the intention and purpose of the Muslims must not be to support and strengthen the tyrannical ruler, but rather to defend their own lives or defend Islam (Ibn Idris, 1410, Vol. 2: 4; Muhaqqiq al-Hilli, 1418, Vol. 1: 109; Shahid al-Awwal, 1417, Vol. 2: 30; Qumi Gilani, 1413, Vol. 1: 375; Sahib al-Jawahir, n.
(
, 
, 
)
