چکیده:
Al-Birouni's abilities in natural sciences have also affected his historian character. Among his several works, Al-Athar Al-Bakiyah and Tahkik Ma Li-l-Hind are the two most important books written by new method of historiography. Since Birouni has been one of few scholars of experimental sciences who has seriously practiced historiography, analysis of various aspects of his historiography is necessary. So, the main aim of the present research is to survey Birouni's attitudes to historiography and to show characteristics of his method. In brief, analyzing and investigating Birouni's books, his social, critical-explanatory, and theological approaches to historiography have been studied. Birouni, away from politicizing, has represented the social and cultural aspects of history. In addition, he has introduced critique approach to historiography by his prominence attention to rationality and experience.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Among Abu Rayhan's numerous works, the writing styles of the two books Al-Athar al-Baqiya and Tahqiq ma li al-Hind can be considered types of historiography that are methodologically unique to him.
In this research, Azarnoush has examined Abu Rayhan's writing and critical method, as well as history, myth, religious studies, and chronology in Al-Athar al-Baqiya, with an emphasis on Iranian history.
Examining Abu Rayhan's diverse approaches to historiography with an emphasis on Al-Athar al-Baqiya and Tahqiq ma li al-Hind, as well as studying how he viewed history through the lens of experimental sciences and the influence of those sciences on Abu Rayhan's historiography, and emphasizing his social approaches, are the most important aspects that distinguish this article from previous research.
Therefore, history, as a "report," is useful and, in his words: "If it were not for the works that have achieved immortality through the effort of the pen, what knowledge would we have of the conditions of past nations?" (Biruni, Tahqiq ma li al-Hind, Persian translation, 1; also see: ibid, Arabic text, 13).
As a result, two factors play an essential role in Abu Rayhan's historiography: first, personality 47 done such things, and from this date, Muslims considered Ashura to be ominous" (Biruni, Al-Athar al-Baqiya, Persian translation 1386 SH: 524, 528).
ـ Hajibabayi, Majid, "The Approach and Method of Abu Rayhan Biruni's Historiography with Emphasis on Al-Athar al-Baqiya," Islamic History Studies, No. 5 (1389 SH).
(
, 
, 
)
