چکیده:
The pathology of development management in the Islamic Republic of Iran is a noteworthy necessity in the process of compensating for the country's backwardness. Regardless of various notions regarding development and its diverse strategies that have turned development into an ambiguous myth, what is seriously important is the management of the process that guides and steers the country from an undesirable and unacceptable level to a desirable and acceptable level. The valuable experiences of Southeast Asian countries in the process of development indicate the vital and sublime role of development management in the process of becoming developed; the reality is that development requires strong and efficient management. The history of five development plans before the victory of the Islamic Revolution and about four development plans in the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and their expected lack of success, is an issue that leads experts on the country's development issues toward the scientific pathology of development management; in this regard, 'the country's political elites, who play a fundamental role in decision-making at high levels,' hold a special position. This article attempts to address the pathology of development management in the Islamic Republic of Iran in the direction of thematic explanation.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Keywords: Pathology, development, development management, political elites (*)Faculty member of the University of Police Sciences, Political Science Knowledge Biannual, No. 2 - Autumn and Winter 2005-2006 Introduction and Problem Statement The phenomenon of development (tnempoleved), progress, and prosperity in economic, political, cultural, and social dimensions is considered among the noteworthy issues of the world's countries, especially developing countries and the Global South.
1. Generalities and Definitions: Genealogy of Development and Theories, Approaches Studies and the review of development literature indicate the use and application of terms such as growth (htworg), modernization (noitazinredom), and development, which share similarities in some dimensions and have differences in others; "The terms modernization and development are generally synonymous, and their difference lies in the fact that modernization recalls progress and movement toward idealized relations assumed as modern by social theorists, whereas development refers to the process of achieving equality with the most advanced countries in the world in terms of economic production of goods and services" (Palmer, 1973, p.
Of course, this concept has broad dimensions that include the recognition and study of the pathologies of planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling, as well as cultural, economic, political, and social variables on one hand; and on the other hand, the nature of the personality of political elites (instrumental) and their epistemological capabilities in the field of development, and their insight and intelligence in recognizing domestic, regional, and international domains that influence the development process, and how they make decisions within a scientific and logical framework by making intelligent and prudent use of the capabilities of experts and researchers, so that a lower error rate occurs in various dimensions of the development management process.
(
, 
, 
)
