چکیده:
Different theories have been proposed regarding how Iran was conquered by Muslim Arabs and the fall of the Sasanian Empire. Why and how the Arabs were able to overthrow the great Sasanian Empire and dominate all of Iran during that era for approximately a century is a fundamental issue; however, the question of what role and what types of cooperation the Iranians themselves had with the conquerors during the conquest of Iran is the subject of the present research. Iranians engaged in cooperation with the Arabs with motivations such as preserving life, property, and position, fear, the compulsion of circumstances, and other similar issues. The cooperation of Iranians with the Arabs can include intelligence gathering, reporting news, hospitality, military cooperation, etc. The time period discussed in this research begins from the start of the conquests during the caliphate of Abu Bakr and continues until the death of Yazdegerd III and thereafter until the end of the first century AH.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Studies in the History of Islam Fourth Year/Issue /13 Summer 2012 The Role of Iranians in the Conquest of Iran by the Arabs from the Beginning to the End of the First Century AH (Groups, Motivations, and Types of Cooperation) Zohreh Dehghanpour{o1o} Mohsen Masoumi{o2o} Abstract: {IBDifferent theories have been proposed regarding how Iran was conquered by Muslim Arabs and the fall of the Sassanid Empire.
Tabari has recorded the dialogue of Rostam Farrokhzad with the people of Hira during the Battle of Qadisiyyah, a part of which clearly illustrates this aspect of the Iranians' motives, especially the people of Sawad and the Arabs of this region, to accompany the conquerors: After Rostam rebuked the people of Hira for making peace and cooperating with the Arabs, one of the individuals from this region, who apparently was among the first to make peace with the Muslims, says: "...
If the people of a city surrendered without war and made peace on the condition of paying an annual amount, the peasant, marches lord, or local ruler would remain in their position, and the life, property, and freedom of the farmers would be preserved, and as long as they remained faithful to their covenant, they would not suffer any hardship from the Arabs{o6o} and the only noticeable change was the placement of the lords{o(1)Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (1967), Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, Vol. 3, Beirut: Dar al-Rithat, 2nd ed.
(
, 
, 
)
