چکیده:
Contingency in line with general concepts such as “existence and non-existence” , “unity and plurality” , and “ causality and being caused” is one of the fundamental and remarkable philosophical issues. The proper explanation of the different meanings of contingency and of the relationship of these meanings to each other make it possible to correctly understand and prove many other principal philosophical problems. Essential contingency and dispositional contingency are among the important meanings of contingency , so that the way we explain them will change basically the destiny of problems such as “coming into being and eternity” , “ potentiality and actuality” , and “causality and being caused” . Sheikh Ishraq for the first time has raised the issue of dispositional contingency , while contradicting Ibn Sina's argument for the rule that “ every event is preceded by potentiality and by matter that possesses that potentiality” . MullaSadra has dealt with the differences between essential contingency and dispositional contingency , and MullaHadiSabzevari has categorized these differences into six groups.At least in sixteen pieces of his works, MullaSadra has expressed his views on the relationship between essential contingency and dispositional contingency, therefore compatibility between these ideas seems very difficult . Indeed, It can be said that these views are contradictory. In this article , using professor Motahhari 's philosophical researches , we have tried to explain the new relationship , obtained in the light of genuineness of existence , between these two meanings of contingency , while judging MullaSadra's different positions concerning essential contingency and dispositional contingency.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Do Fasl Scientific Journal (Scientific-Research Article), Year 11, Issue 1, Spring and Summer 2020 The Impact of the Primacy of Existence in Analyzing the Relationship between Potential Possibility and Essential Possibility Ali Motahhari * Abstract "Possibility" is, alongside general concepts such as "existence and non-existence," "unity and multiplicity," and "causality and effect," one of the fundamental and important philosophical topics.
1 In the second application, anything whose occurrence or non-occurrence does not entail an impossibility possesses occasional possibility (Motahhari 1389b: Vol. 10, 218); Poverty-based Possibility (Amkan al-Faqri): This term of possibility is in opposition to philosophical essential necessity, and what is meant by "possible by poverty-based possibility" is that being which, while its very existence is a reality, is a dependent and needy entity toward another, and in fact, is the very essence of dependence and need toward another and remaining through the remaining of another.
Haji Sabzavari, in his poem, has enumerated six important differences between essential possibility and potential possibility, which are somewhat categorized and detailed in the explanation of Sadr al-Muta'allihin in the first volume 3 of Asfar: Potential possibility is among the actually existing things and has an objective existence, but essential possibility is among the second intelligibles and has no equivalent in the world of external realities (ayn ma bihi), meaning it is only abstracted from its subject without having existence within that subject.
Of course, Mulla Sadra in Asfar also refers to other differences that have not appeared in the explanation of Haji Sabzavari; including the fact that essential possibility exists in all essences, whether incorporeal or material, whereas potential possibility has instances only in material essences (Sadr al-Din Shirazi 1383a: Vol. 1, 174).
(
, 
, 
)
