چکیده:
The consumption of all or majority of properties in charities by some people is of the issues that there are different opinions about inserting it to the adventitious prodigality for being unusual act. Some Islamic jurists with adducing to the absoluteness of the holy Quran verses and many Islamic traditions which they have ordered to donate do not believe that it is an act of a prodigal (Arabic: سفیه safih) and some other jurists with adducing to the Quran verses and Islamic traditions which absolutely forbid extravagance even in charities think that it is extravagance and wastefulness and believe the prodigality of its performer (agent; doer). Some others for combining these two theories guide the discussion to the almsgiver (donor) and believe that the criterion for knowing the rightness (truthfulness) and untruthfulness of prodigality for this act is the amount of his knowledge and trust in God. In the circumstance of the absence of this feature his act is prodigal. Meanwhile presenting a comprehensive explanation of each theory this research has examined and studied the evidences of these opinions and finally with accepting the role of custom in this issue and studying the different aspects of this act and counting some of these states a prodigal act and some others not being prodigal, it can be said that if there is not the factor of the repetition the indication (revealer) of this act cannot denote the prodigality of almsgiver.
خلاصه ماشینی:
2. Accidental Imprudence in the Instance of "Spending Most Property on Charitable Matters" One of the topics raised in this type of imprudence is the examination of cases that can serve as an instance for the subject of imprudence; such as spending property in cases that are considered sinful by Sharia, or the extravagances that occur among some young people, which jurists often discuss these matters at the end of the discussion on maturity and the methods of testing a mature and prudent person they present (Allamah Hilli, 1420: 2/536; Bahrani, 1405: 20/355) and state that such financial transactions are unconventional in the eyes of rational people and can indicate the imprudence (safah) of the doer of these acts.
4- Existence of Tradition (Sira) This claim that spending and giving most of one's wealth on charitable matters is an imprudent act, contradicts the existing tradition (sira) among the companions of the Messenger( and some of the Imams(; such as the existing tradition of Imam Hasan(, who, according to historical accounts, spent his entire wealth in the way of God twice during his noble life (Ibn Shahr Ashub Sarvi Mazandarani, 1379: 4/15), and many narrations regarding the tradition of the Commander of the Faithful and his Ahl al-Bayt( that were revealed concerning the Surah "Hal Ata.
(
, 
, 
)
