چکیده:
Ali Asghar Mirbagherifard[1] Seyed Mohamad Jalil Mostafavi Rozati[2] Comparative Analysis of Persian Works by Shaikh al-Ishraq and Mathnawi Ma’navi from the Perspective of Allegory Abstract A thorough and in-depth study of the works of some Iranian scholars and mystics reveals their meaningful contributions and suggests the continuity of their method. Mawlānā is a poet who, according to his testimonies and his own works, has influenced his predecessors and mystics. On the other hand, Shaikh Shahāb ad-Dīn Suhrawardi, known as Shaikh al-Ishraq, is a scholar who has had a serious impact on philosophers and mystical ideas after a certain philosophical-mystical view.A brief view of Suhrawardi’s writings reinforces this suspicion that Mawlānā has also seen in his Mathnavi. Mystical works has special language that carry mystical experiences and didactic points. One of the important areas in the expression of mystics and philosophers is the use of parables and stories. The Persian works of Suhrawardi, in which the Shaikh language is approached in the language of mystical works, is full of allegories and anecdotes. A view of Persian works of Suhrawardi leads the reader familiar with Mathnavi into meaningful parallels between the allegories and the anecdotes of these works. The present research seeks to examine the structure and content of these allegories in a comparative and descriptive-analytical method. Keywords: Mathnavi Ma’navi, Suhrawardi’s Persian works, comparative literature, allegory. 1 Professor of persian language and literature ,Esfahan university (corresponding author) [2] Student of PH.D. Persian and literature , Esfahan university
خلاصه ماشینی:
An Analytical Comparison of the Persian Works of Sheikh Ishraq and Masnavi Ma'navi From the Perspective of Allegorization Seyyed Mohammad Jalil Mostafavi Rozati */ Seyyed Ali Asghar Mirbagherifard ** A precise examination of the works of certain Iranian sages and mystics reveals meaningful commonalities among them, which indicates the continuity of their methods.
In this research, we seek to answer these fundamental questions: which allegories in Suhrawardi's Persian works and the Masnavi have common points, what is their content, what are the common approaches of these two sages in narration, and what are the similarities and differences in the structure of their allegories?
The novelty of this research lies in the fact that, on one hand, Suhrawardi's Persian works will be weighed against the Masnavi, which itself is effective in making the research more limited and specialized, and on the other hand, common allegories and their structures will be compared, the importance of which is in no way less than their themes, as they demonstrate the similarity in the expressive techniques of the two.
The important difference between Suhrawardi's second allegory and Rumi's allegory of the falcon and the crone relates to their endings; in the Masnavi, the king himself goes towards the falcon and his place of captivity, whereas in the Treatise of the Red Intellect, it is the falcon who takes advantage of the opportunity and flies towards the desert (which is a symbol of the realm of meaning).
Among these commonalities, "allegory," which is one of the most important rhetorical devices, has a prominent function both in Suhrawardi's works and in Rumi's mystical language.
(
, 
, 
)
