The rational proof of the Absolute Perfect and a critique and review of some insufficient arguments مقاله

خلاصه ماشینی:

Therefore, discussing essential contingency and its inclusion in the argument does not conflict with the primacy of existence; rather, adopting this title is an a posteriori proof of the correctness of the result; because essence is a necessary implication of poverty-based contingency; meaning that the existence of the Necessary Being is such that essence cannot be abstracted from it; whereas the existence of the possible being is such that essence is abstracted from it, indicating the limitation of its external existence. In the second objection, firstly, it is implicitly accepted that if primacy belongs to existence, the argument is complete; because when existence becomes primary, there is no way for essence to be the emptiness of the very thing that has been filled with existence, and the meaning of this statement is that essence is the existential limit. " (Nikzad, ibid: 184) The critic in this criticism does not notice that this statement necessitates a contradiction; because if the essence of the Necessary Being is characterized as "by another" in terms of being characterized by the attributes of perfection, Allameh's claim that the existence of the Necessary Being is infini te, will be complete; because it is impossible for the essence of the Necessary Being to be both by essence and by another; since the characterization of a single thing by necessity both by essence and by another is a contradiction. (Nikzad, ibid: 201) The Eighteenth Argument If the absolute perfect is non-existent in reality, it is either impossible by essence or impossible by another; The absolute perfect is not impossible by essence; because it does not contain or necessitate a contradiction; The absolute perfect is not impossible by another; because possibility is accompanied by weakness and limitation, and is incompatible with the absolute perfect.