چکیده:
Explicitness of international agreements is a necessary condition when ratifying and joining them، because the consequences of these agreements are based on the way their concepts are conceived. In this paper the ambiguities of the convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) are evaluated "conceptually"، "structurally"، and "basics". The results show that the convention suffers from essential ambiguities in these three respects. These ambiguities result in the conclusion that countries willing to join the convention do not realize the intentions of the founders of the convention and each country accept the contents based on the mental assumptions of its own society. Different cultures and belief systems understand these concepts differently; therefore، every country should disambiguate these concepts before joining the convention.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The "Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women," adopted on December 18, 1979 (27 Azar 1358), by the United Nations General Assembly, is an example of international contracts that the Iranian male government is pursuing for ratification and membership.
Now, if we want to determine legal laws regardless of objective distinctions; in that case, external realities will be ignored, and human rights will be determined based on a series of conventional matters.
Thus, considering that the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women insists on ignoring objective distinctions; it seems that the structure of its provisions is based on irrational methods and approaches.
Unconnected In the preamble of the Convention, a logical correlation and connection has been established between a series of political and social categories such as: "consolidation," "peace," "international security," "national sovereignty" and "territorial integrity," "development" and "social progress" on one hand, and the achievement of full "equality" between men and women on the other.
Therefore, the new world, on one hand, demands political and legal demarcation, and on the other hand, demands the recognition of transnational legal rulings; this conflict exists within the new world and has nothing to do with traditional realms; meaning, even if Muslims do not consider Islamic Sharia as the basis for accepting the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the doubt regarding the extra-legal nature of international assemblies will still arise for them.
The Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women faces ambiguity regarding the establishment of justice and equality as a basis.
(
, 
, 
)
