چکیده:
In "Knowledge Management", four outputs for the existing humanities are listed: 1. Enhancing knowledge; 2. To function; 3. Application; 4. Commercialization. The late concept of commercialization, with its fundamental problem of "material and commodity view of knowledge" and the direct influence of "neoliberalism", "theory of knowledge economics" and "concept of knowledge industry", has caused deep earthquakes in world knowledge. In the logic of commercialization, knowledge and the university serving free economic markets and commercial companies are described in such a way that the center of gravity of the two is often referred to as "material gain" rather than "understanding" and "truth". The present research has been done with a qualitative approach and with a "descriptive-analytical method" and the authors have used two research strategies "summary of documents" and "end to beginning thinking" to achieve the research results. This study has evaluated the epistemological foundations and non-epistemological factors of commercialization of humanities according to the "principle of prioritizing the understanding of theory over its study" and using the "fundamental methodology of the development of scientific theories". Explaining the benefits and pests of commercialization of humanities is another goal of this research. In the six epistemological foundations of the commercialization of the humanities, the traces of the fundamental problem of commercialization, namely the materialist view of knowledge, can be seen. Therefore, "application of humanities" and related concepts cannot be reduced to "commercialization of humanities". Also, among the non-epistemological and contextual factors of commercialization of humanities, three areas of "knowledge", "university" and "education and research" that are seriously in the commercialization radius were selected and examined. In these areas, too, a commodity, object, and tool view of knowledge can be seen.
خلاصه ماشینی:
A Critical Evaluation of the Concept of Commercialization in Existing Humanities Hossein Askari Corresponding author and PhD student in Strategic Knowledge Management, University and Higher Research Institute for National Defense and Strategic Studies.
The commodity and commercial perception of knowledge, the influence of market and industry policies on knowledge production, the promotion of firm-based and capitalist management in academic environments, and an excessive emphasis on applied research are among the important characteristics of the second model of knowledge production that have influenced existing knowledge management (Gibbons et al.
Criteria of "beneficial knowledge" in the Islamic epistemological paradigm (extracted from the narrational sources of the Ahl al-Bayt school, peace be upon them) Given the aforementioned points, the research problem is that if "commercialization" is one of the starting points for the usefulness and advancement of existing humanities, what challenges and criticisms does this concept face from the perspective of the Islamic epistemological paradigm in terms of "epistemological foundations" and "non-epistemological and contextual factors"?
" Commercialization means the demand to convert new findings and research ideas into products, services, and technologies that can be offered to the market; in commercialization, this demand 3 provides the opportunity to earn income and then facilitates the commercialization of that knowledge (Knowledge-Based Journal: Special Issue on the Applicability of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2018: p.
In the process of critical evaluation of this concept, three categories of "knowledge," "university," and "education and research," which fall within the serious sphere of influence of the concept of commercialization of human sciences, have been examined as the most important "non-epistemological and contextual factors of commercialization.
(
, 
, 
)
