خلاصه ماشینی:
In continuation of the proposal of religious science in this issue, which is also its final part, the responses of Mostafa Malekian (Professor of Philosophy and Theology in the seminary and university), George El Murphy (Professor of Science and Religion in the seminary) Luther Ohio, Edward B.
Those who have this third meaning in mind intend to create, instead of the various types of sciences and knowledges that humans have produced through the aid of the four methods—empirical, rational, intuitive and mystical, and historical—for example, instead of physics, chemistry, biology, botany, zoology, psychology, sociology, economics (empirical sciences), mathematics, logic, philosophy (rational sciences), mysticism (intuitive and mystical sciences), linguistics, history, historical geography (historical sciences), ethics, law, aesthetics, art, and literature, they intend to build and engage with sciences and knowledges using sacred religious and sectarian texts, and to replace those secular sciences and knowledges with these so-called religious sciences and knowledges.
Yes, it is possible to construct and engage with a theory about a subject or issue by drawing inspiration from some of the propositions mentioned in sacred religious and sectarian texts, and then attempt to make that theory reasonable and acceptable to the convention of the experts of that science through the aid of the followed and accepted scientific method to which that theory belongs.
Religion deals with ultimate reality, the "Ground of Being" (2) or God, and science essentially deals with the rest of reality which is dependent on God (practically speaking, we do not have much access to a "scientific" understanding of the universe).