چکیده:
This writing is about the dialectical methods of Ibn Taymiyyah al-Harrani in the book Minhaj al-Sunnah; a book that, according to many Sunni scholars, is considered one of the best books in refuting the beliefs of the Imami Shia. To better examine this discourse, it is necessary to first examine Ibn Taymiyyah's method in terms of debate: whether his method of debating Allamah al-Hilli follows 'Jadal al-Ahsan' (the best form of debate), which is approved by God, the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH), and all Islamic scholars, or whether it follows a false method, meaning 'Jadal al-Batil' (false debate), which is neither approved by God nor the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH). To become familiar with debate, we first present brief discussions about it and then proceed to examine the words and tactics that Ibn Taymiyyah employed in this book to respond to Allamah al-Hilli. We reach the conclusion that he was not acting in the capacity of 'Jadal al-Ahsan' to be able to reach the truth or a desirable result, but rather was seeking to refute Allamah's book, albeit through the method of 'Jadal al-Batil'. He did not observe many aspects of debate and 'Jadal al-Ahsan' in both the ethical and scientific dimensions, and it cannot be regarded as an important scientific or even ethical book.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Allamah considers this narration as evidence for the superiority of Ali (AS), but Ibn Taymiyyah, in responding to Allamah, says: That the Prophet (PBUH) would have said such a thing after the charity of the ring is an obvious lie; because the Companions spend in the way of Allah when in need, and their spending in terms of size and benefit is greater than a single ring.
When we refer to the words of Ibn Taymiyyah in Minhaj al-Sunnah, we see that in the context of argument and opposition, he uses incorrect analogies; in such a way that neither he himself accepts them as a correct reason and proof, nor does his opponent; for example, A) when he reaches Imam Hussain (AS), he says: If you say they insulted the family of Hussain (AS) and killed Hussain, with Ibn Taymiyyah, Ahmad, previously cited, vol.
5 Ibn Taymiyyah has also extended these false attributions and claims to the companions of the Prophet6; so that in response to the hadith of Ibn Abbas, who said that there is no verse in the Quran beginning with (یَا أَیُّهَا الَّذِینَ آمَنُواْ) such that Ali7 is not the head, leader, master, and chief of the instances of that verse, Hakim al-Nishapuri, Muhammad, al-Mustadrak alal-Sahihayn, vol.
3 Conclusion Ibn Taymiyyah considers one of the methods of argumentation to be "the best argument" (Jadal al-Ahsan) and seeks its criterion in the Quran and the Sunnah of the Prophet(6), but when he is in the position of refuting the book of Allamah al-Hilli; Ibn Taymiyyah, Ahmad, previously cited, vol.
(
, 
, 
)
