چکیده:
The present article has examined the precedence of the subject over the verb. This article cites the views regarding the impossibility and the permissibility of the subject preceding the verb, and then addresses the proponents of these views, their arguments, and the critique of those arguments; in the next stage, it deals with the objections to both views and the responses to some of those objections. Finally, after examining the various dimensions of each view and the linguistic and semantic impact of the view regarding the impossibility or permissibility of the subject preceding the verb, it has deemed the permissibility of the subject preceding the verb to be the correct view.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Surah Yusuf - 23 Surah Baqarah - 48 And if what they mean by Fa'il is only the subject pronoun, then even this claim and the seven reasons that Ibn al-Anbari mentions for it can only prove that the letters Alif, Waw, and Ya in the verbs "یضربان ، یضربون و یضربین" are like a part of the verb, but it is not evidence of their being the Fa'il; and just as can be inferred from the evidences, the grammarians of Kufa also did not consider these markers to be the Fa'il.
So, let us briefly address this subject: The majority of grammarians and rhetoricians divide the informative sentence into nominal and verbal, considering the ruling of the nominal sentence to be stability (thubut) and the ruling of the verbal sentence to be occurrence (huduth), but the nominal sentence Mughni al-Labib – Chapter Four – Positions where the pronoun refers back to something delayed in wording and rank – Second case "Al-Kisa'i said: The Fa'il is omitted" Sharh Ibn Aqil – Fa'il – When the Fa'il is dual or plural, the verb is stripped of the dual and plural markers according to the majority of Arabs In Persian literature, these markers are called subject markers (shenase-ye fa'li).