چکیده:
In light of the extensive developments in artificial intelligence technologies and their increasing entry into the realms of digital transactions, the Islamic jurisprudence system faces new challenges in interpreting, aligning, and applying rulings. This is particularly true in a space where transactional decisions are no longer solely dependent on humans and algorithms play an intermediary role. The aim of this research is to assess the feasibility of aligning Shia principles of jurisprudence—including the rules of criteria for rulings (Malaikat al-Ahkam), Maslahah Mursalah (unrestricted public interest), the rule of No Harm (La Darar), and the practice of rational people (Sira al-Uqala)—with the decision-making logic of intelligent algorithms in modern transaction mechanisms. The research method in this study is descriptive, analytical, and comparative, conducted through the analysis of jurisprudential texts, philosophy of technology discussions, and the structure of machine learning algorithms. The findings of the research show that principles such as the rule of justice and the rule of no harm have the capability to be embedded in decision-making algorithms as ethical criteria and can play a role in the formation of digital transactional jurisprudence; furthermore, utilizing the practice of rational people as a model of practical rationality in the process of training intelligent systems can be effective in the process of learning and recognizing rational behaviors. However, limitations such as the inability to detect intention, the lack of understanding of social custom, and the inability of machines to explain specific contexts constitute a serious obstacle to the complete alignment of the principles of jurisprudence with machine decision-making. Consequently, it can be said that the principles of jurisprudence possess the necessary conceptual capacity to be present in the field of artificial intelligence, but their effective utilization requires a cognitive redefinition of the principles, the design of jurisprudential regulatory frameworks, and the adoption of an interdisciplinary approach that enables the combination of religious rationality and technology; this step could be the starting point for the transformation of the Islamic legal system in facing the intelligent world.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The research findings show that principles such as the rule of justice and la darar have the capability to be embedded in decision-making algorithms as ethical criteria and can play a role in the formation of digital transactional jurisprudence; furthermore, utilizing the practice of rational people as a model of practical rationality in the process of training intelligent systems can be effective in the process of learning and recognizing rational behaviors.
(Shamshi Koushki, 1400: 33) Given the above, the main question of the present research is: "Does Usul al-Fiqh, with its logical and argumentative structure, have the capability to align with artificial intelligence decision-making algorithms in the field of the jurisprudence of modern transactions?" This question refers to the theoretical and practical feasibility of this alignment and requires a comparative study of foundational principles with algorithmic logic, an analysis of practical cases in modern transactions, and an evaluation of its jurisprudential and ethical consequences.
Aligning these principles with algorithmic decision-making mechanisms requires understanding the structural nature and ultimate goals of both systems, so that algorithms can be matched with criteria such as the removal of gharar (uncertainty), the necessity of mutual consent, the prohibition of coercion, and the possibility of jurisprudential supervision; ultimately, the jurisprudence of modern transactions, as a contextual variable, provides the platform in which these digital decisions are realized and subjected to Sharia legitimacy testing; this emerging field requires an ijtihadi re-reading, the enhancement of jurisprudential tools, and the creation of a common discourse between jurists and technology experts so that algorithms are considered not only technical tools but also responsible, evaluable entities compliant with the teachings of Islamic jurisprudence.
(
, 
, 
)
