چکیده:
Persian language and literature have been very important in the formation of Iranian identity and have been mixed with the principles of patriotism, loyalty, rationalism and religion. The poets of the political literature of constitutionalism have used these capitals in the service of popular ideals. Freedom and nationalist ideas were among the main themes of constitutionalism; But for some reasons, each of the intellectuals had a special perception of them; For example: freedom in Farrokhi's view, in addition to the concepts of democracy and social freedoms and legalism, is mixed with the concepts of mythological, national and religious elements, modernism, cosmopolitanism and general peace and the seasoning of socialist thoughts.More than other constitutional poets, Farrakhi-Yazdi uses mythological and historical elements for social and political ideals. But in this way, he never falls into extreme archaism and chauvinism. The author tries to investigate these issues in a descriptive and analytical way by analyzing and comparing Farrokhi Yazidi's poems and articles and by using the works and researches that have been done about his life, poetry and thought.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Freedom-seeking and nationalist thoughts were among the main themes of the Constitutionalism; however, for various reasons, each intellectual had a specific interpretation of them; for example: in Farrokhi's view, freedom, in addition to the concepts of democracy, social freedoms, and rule of law, is mixed with mythological, national, and religious elements, modernism, cosmopolitanism, public peace, and a touch of socialist ideas.
But the main problem in this regard was not only the incomplete recognition of Western modernism; rather, the lack of suitable social and political foundations was also among the reasons for these misunderstandings and contradictions; therefore, although the greatest achievement of Constitutionalism seemed to be freedom, the concept of freedom was also accompanied by various interpretations; for example: freedom, from Bahar's perspective, had the flavor of independence and patriotism; while freedom, in Farrokhi Yazdi's view, in addition to the concepts of democracy, social freedoms, and legalism, was mixed with concepts such as: mythology, nationality, religion, modernism, cosmopolitanism, public peace, and the seasoning of socialist ideas and a socialist society, shaping his Iranian, Islamic, and modernist identity.
This intellectual and political current encompassed various spectrums; some, such as Mohammad Taqi Bahar, leaned more towards a powerful national government based on popular vote and public participation, despite the existence of political and social parties and factions within the framework of the law; others, like Mirzadeh Eshqi, emphasized the authority of the government while preserving the independence of the homeland and the glories of ancient Iran; and some, like Farrokhi Yazdi, in addition to the ideas of a communal society, thought about preserving the territorial integrity of Iran as well as its national and religious identity.
(
, 
, 
)
