چکیده:
literary differences of different countries with each other. This provides opportunities for familiarity and cultural and literary exchange between countries; Of course, nowadays new methods of comparative literature such as cultural studies have been created which made it possible to conduct various comparative studies in the context of the literature of a nation. Nowadays reading novels in various societies is not only an entertainment aspect; Rather, it is a valuable tool that the writer uses in publishing social and political issues, thoughts and criticisms. In the upcoming research, a comparative study of common social themes in two works " The Accomplice" by Jafar Modares-Sadeghi and "In Doubious Battle" by John Stainbeck has been done in a descriptive-analytical manner. The comparative analysis of these two works shows that both authors have goals and hopes that have social and political roots, and these social goals form the main basis of the two works. Although these two novels are similar in social themes such as social movements, strikes, repression, discrimination and political issues, but the way they deal with these issues has differences in some cases, for example John Stainbeck explicitly Terry expresses the issues but Modares Sadeghi reflects the issues in the envelope. Most of the characters in both novels are people who are serious political and social activists in their lives; For this reason all the events of the two novels are formed in connection with a social challenge and the story moves around the axis of that event.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In the present research, a descriptive-analytical method is used to conduct a comparative study of common social themes in two works: "The Accomplice" by Jafar Modarres Sadeghi and "In Dubious Battle" by John Steinbeck.
Although these two novels share social themes such as social movements, strikes, repression, discrimination, and political issues, their approach to these subjects differs in some cases; for example, John Steinbeck expresses issues more explicitly, whereas Modarres Sadeghi reflects them more subtly.
The present research conducts a comparative study of two novels: "Accomplice" by Jafar Modarres Sadeghi and "In Dubious Battle" by John Steinbeck.
In these two novels, Jafar Modarres Sadeghi and John Steinbeck sometimes conservatively, through the form of a narrator or via the characters' voices with a neutral tone and metaphorical expression, reflect sociological issues within their stories.
The novels "Accomplice" and "In Dubious Battle" deal with anti-tyranny, class consciousness, strikes, discrimination, and issues of this kind, which from a sociological perspective indicate the existence of great social suffering, dire economic conditions, and ignorance in the society in which the two authors lived; also, the reflection of these issues in the works of these two authors often depicts a call for their reform.
" (Lukacs, 1387: 20) In this regard, in the following research, two realistic works, Accomplice by Jafar Modarres Sadeghi and In Dubious Battle by John Steinbeck, have been examined considering some of the important approaches of sociological criticism, focusing on content-oriented theories such as the theory of content or the reflection theory.
(
, 
, 
)
