چکیده:
Since the second half of the 20th century, women have become one of the most controversial topics in political philosophy. Some thinkers of women's studies, such as Susan Muller Okin and Carol Pattman, showed in their research that political philosophy was originally male, and therefore, as soon as it is placed against women as equals, it collapses so much that there is nothing to use. It does not remain. Therefore, two fundamental questions are raised at the same time: First, what should women's studies do to raise its philosophical issues? And second, what to do with the great tradition of political philosophy? So far, three answers have been given to these two questions: escaping from philosophy, establishing feminist political philosophy, and de-gendering political philosophy. But as we will show, these answers are ultimately not convincing. On the other hand, in this article, we have put forward the idea of neutral political philosophy, which tries to find a way to preserve the great tradition of political philosophy with the inferential analytical method that governs philosophical debates, and that the discussion of women in terms of existence Cognitive find the possibility of being present and recognized.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Some thinkers of women's studies, such as Susan Moller Okin and Carole Pateman, have concluded in their research that political philosophy is fundamentally masculine and therefore, as soon as it encounters the presence of woman, it collapses so much that nothing remains to be used.
Researchers such as Susan Moller Okin, Carole Pateman, and others have attempted to show the gendered nature of great political philosophies through a re-reading of them.
1. 2 Susan Muller Okin: Women in Western Political Philosophy Susan Muller Okin (1946-2004) was a feminist philosopher and theorist who, although she departed this world quite early, according to many, left behind important and substantial works that have had significant impacts, especially on the field of feminist studies (Ackerly, 2004).
In her investigation, she attempts to pose the question in reverse: "What would happen to these great philosophies if we were to imagine women as beings morally and politically equal to men?" (Okin, 2013: 275); through a detailed examination of each of these philosophers, Okin concludes that, with the exception of Plato, none of them inherently provide the possibility of such equality.
According to Okin, given the praise that Aristotle bestows upon such a hierarchical order and regards it as something natural, necessary, and good, there remains no place at all for the freedom and equality of women in the public sphere and political life (Okin, 2013: 277).
Zillah Eisenstein, in her book The Future of Radical Liberal Feminism, while attempting to critique the legacy of Western political philosophy like Susan Moller Okin, does not, unlike her, advocate for the denial and abandonment of this great tradition.
(
, 
, 
)
