چکیده:
Introduction The subject of this research is adjusting the culture of self-righteousness with teaching the culture of diversity, which ranges from ideological totalitarianism to reflective interactions in philosophical hermeneutics Method In this research, the analytical-inferential method of qualitative research was used. After examining the theoretical foundations and explaining ideology and its possibility and how it affects the formation of self-righteous culture, philosophical hermeneutics has been used to moderate this phenomenon Results The polarized schemas of the specific group, which is induced by authoritarian and totalitarian information tools, have formed the knowledge and social attitude of the citizens and the implementation of that mental model, in the role of behavior model with Otherwise, it is induced. The difference between this citizen and the powerful group is only in the possibility of implementing authority, otherwise both minds are similar. The manifestation of this culture is visible in continuity, from the general policies of the departments to the interpersonal relationships of people. Discussion It will be easy to claim that philosophical hermetotics with the element of combining intellectual horizons (instead of the positive "self" and the negative other), and in the process of free me and you reflective interactions, can moderate this social syndrome to some extent. , and there should be a balance between rights and duties. But the age is the age of the life of ideologies, not reflective interactions; Realistic planning is the ability to live in the age of ideology. By redefining and expanding the meaning of "self", inspired by concepts such as judgment, taste and common sense from the central concepts of philosophical hermeneutics, it is possible to provide the ground for entering the culture of alterity from within the culture of self-righteousness. The details of this matter are given in the article.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In fact, an attempt has been made to show how the polarized schemata of a specific group, imposed by authoritarian and totalitarian information tools, shape the social cognition and attitudes of citizens, and how the implementation of that mental model, acting as a pattern of behavior toward the 'other', is imposed.
While philosophical hermeneutics, through the element of merging intellectual horizons (instead of a positive "self" and a negative "other") and in the process of reflective "I-Thou" interactions, can serve as a moderator for this social syndrome and create a balance between right and duty, it is not sufficient, because the era is the era of the life of ideologies, not reflective interactions; realistic planning for teaching the ability to live in the age of ideology is required.
Thus, ideology is a mental representation in the forms of social cognition that, unlike personal opinions, are essentially a type of shared or "widespread 7" ideas (Gaskell & Fraser, 1- key dichotomies 2- Concomitant role conceptions 3- individual beings 4- largely teleological 5- personal aggrandizement 6- engendering a kleptocracy 7- widespread 1990).
As shared social mental schemas, ideologies must be completely general and abstract, because they must be relevant to different individuals, circumstances, experiences, and social actions in various situations over a relatively long period, so that they can maintain their identity and secure the interests of a group.
(
, 
, 
)
