چکیده:
The governments of the Middle East Regional Security complex owe much of their legitimacy to religion of Islam. Therefore, they are either claiming the Islamic government or they are trying to show their commitment to Islam in some way. The first case result of this factor will be a common and prominent identity in the solidarity and closeness of these countries. But with a little tolerance, it can be said that often Conflicts and violence in the Middle East - albeit ostensibly - are rooted in religious conflicts, especially religious ones.This paper seeks to examine, in a case study, the distinction between the true and potential status of religious communities in the Middle East and its current status in the context of the geocultural challenge of religions and sects in the path to regional peace and security. The question in this study is how, despite their scope of acceptance, does Islam not have the ability to prevent violence and conflict and, consequently, to establish peace and stability through the enjoyment of shared beliefs among its followers? In this regard, Copenhagen's security-oriented and regionalist approach has been used to better explain the approach.The research hypothesis is that the domination of the centralized state and the weakness and deviations of transnational religious groups have led to the instrumental and corresponding use of the Middle Eastern identity-oriented states of religious and religious identity to gain legitimacy and make others illegitimate.
خلاصه ماشینی:
They have been able to reconstruct their socio-political, cultural-civilizational, and identity positions through an evolutionary process; although Barry Buzan, in his article titled "New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century," states that the Islamic world and the traditional civilization of Middle Eastern countries are considered only a group that has not succeeded in re-establishing itself since the decline of the Ottoman Empire; however, existing realities indicate that new and often radical Islamism is considered the main factor in the transformation of political rules in the Middle East.
Theoretical Foundations The Middle East Regional Security Complex The theories of the Copenhagen School, and particularly Barry Buzan's security complex theory, by highlighting concepts such as identity, proximity or geographical adjacency, shared history, patterns of friendship and enmity, and similar modes of securitization, have been able to incorporate the components of culture, history, and geography into the analysis of national issues, blend material and extra-material elements, and at the same time, integrate intra-state developments with trans-state processes and regional issues with the national interests of countries.
Since the vastness of the Middle East region and the effects and consequences of ISIS's presence for this region do not allow this writing to address all matters in this limited opportunity, therefore, for example, examining the Arab organization of the Gulf Cooperation Council, the impacts on the security environment of these countries, and following that 1- Of course, a point that should not be overlooked is that few supra-religious groups are seen in the region that can carry an independent title, because even if they are not dependent on the governments of the region, they are in some way created and are playthings of powers outside the region.
(
, 
, 
)
