چکیده:
The concept of desire was particularly important in Freud's teachings, and he paid attention to penis as an important element in male biological structure. Using Saussure's linguistics, Lacan was able to provide a linguistic reading of the concept of desire and penis. Therefore, the Freudian penis gave way to the Lacanian phallus, and desire was also recognized as a linguistic category along with other concepts such as lack and excess. In this research, our qualitative library-based reading of the corpus discusses the position of the phallus as a linguistic factor that always keeps the subject away from objet petit a. The results obtained from the Lacanian reading of the above-mentioned stories show that the characters in these stories have accepted their castration from the very beginning and, with the hope of attaining the phallus, they have entered the field of signification by desiring The big Other, which has in turn referred them from one sign to another. As a subject, these characters have never been able to obtain the object of their desire, and desire as a linguistic matter is always represented by a lack or an excess. The subject's encounter with the lack of the object of desire causes the reproduction of the signifier and preservation of language, and the encounter with the excess of the said object leads to the symbolic death or psychosis of the subject.
خلاصه ماشینی:
" Mohseni (1386), in the article "Jacques Lacan, Language, and the Unconscious," attempted to show how discourse takes shape with the presence of the element of language as a symbolic system; a system that is formed in the mind of the child/subject to place them in a competitive space with the father/big Other in the possession of the mother/small Other/object α.
Considering the positioning of the ego against the signifier "Phallus", the psychic structure of each individual takes shape: Diagram No. 1- Classification of the individual's psychic structure with respect to the Phallus (Refer to the image on the page) The psychotic believes they possess the Phallus; therefore, the big Other rejects them; consequently, when we speak of the relationship between language and the subject, neurotics and perverts simply fall into the process of subjectification, they desire, and settle in the realm of language.
Finally, Mah Sima goes to Damavand, and when she sees Ingrid in Amir Reza's absence, the aforementioned foolish negation disappears and the lack of the Other is revealed: "She felt that her inside had become empty, of deceptive dreams and fantasies, of the illusion of love, of the illusion of return, of the past" (ibid: 153).
Transgression of another great desire and the appropriation of jouissance for the benefit of the subject; being drawn into the maw of natural/symbolic death In Return, Mah Sima can be introduced as a character corresponding to Mohsen Meftah, Mahmoud Sokhteh, and Naser Sokhteh in Blood-Eaten.
(
, 
, 
)
