چکیده:
The conceptual duality of good and right is one of the most basic issues of political thought,. The superiority and inferiority of these two concepts to each other has been a matter of dispute between even modern political philosophers such as Kant and Rawls. In this article, an attempt has been made to check and analyze the dominant view of the discourses of the Islamic Republic on these two concepts, and if there is one or both of them in these discourses, their precedence and backwardness are also examined. Therefore, by assuming the importance of these two concepts in looking of the political , in this article, we try to find out: How has this duality been reflected in the dominant political discourses in the Islamic Republic? Is it possible to find traces of this duality in the system of intra-discourse meanings and inter-discourse confrontations in the political field after the Islamic Revolution of Iran? The analysis method of this article is based on discourse theory. In the theoretical framework, while referring to the conceptual discussions about the duality of good and right, we have put more emphasis on John Rawls's theory of justice as fairness, which, while trying to present a combination between the categories of right and good, places logical precedence over right. The findings of the research show that the two dominant discourses of reformism/ principalism and their predecessors in the period of the Islamic Republic basically have benevolent approaches and were aimed at an idealistic goal.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"Is it possible to find signs of this duality in the value systems and inter-discursive oppositions in the political sphere after the Islamic Revolution in Iran?" The methodology employed in this article is based on discourse analysis theory.
The answer to this question can create two different social and discursive systems around each of these poles; in such a way that it guides the fate and path of society toward two different ways; therefore, the duality of good and right and the discussion regarding the precedence of one over the other or the logical relationship between these two, is considered among the important topics of political and democratic theory.
This article is derived from the doctoral dissertation of student Afshin Habibzadeh in the Department of Political Science, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, titled "Explaining Political Polarity in the Islamic Republic of Iran (with the centrality of Good and Right)".
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy "How has the duality of right and good been reflected in the dominant political discourses in the Islamic Republic?" "Can signs of this duality be found in the intra-discursive semantic system and inter-discursive oppositions in the political sphere after the Islamic Revolution in Iran?" 1.
Conclusion In this article, we attempted to examine, by reviewing the dominant discourses in the era of the Islamic Republic, the position and nature of the potential duality of right and good in the views of political forces within the framework of the discourse of the Islamic Revolution.
Social and Economic Foundations of Transformation in Dominant Political Discourses in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
(
, 
, 
)
