چکیده:
Usually, in the research related to Iran's constitutional revolution, two discourses, traditional and modern, are considered by researchers. Traditional discourse is considered as the supporter of the status quo, while modern discourse is in opposition to the status quo. Thus, other discourses are not examined. The purpose of this article is to distinguish and identify a discourse called the third way among two modern and traditional discourses, which has received less attention. For this purpose, using the Fairclough's critical discourse analysis. Data was collected from primary and secondary sources and Sources have been reviewed by critical analysis method. The article investigates the discourse of the third way among the works of Davoud Feirahi. The discourse of the third way was a discourse that defined itself against the traditional and modern discourse and at the same time negated the West and tradition, and proved modernity and religion. The main question is "How does the third way discourse resist the traditional discourse?" The possible answer to the question is as follows: the third way discourse in the constitutional era, based on its social contexts, and its discourse position, resists against the ideology and power of traditional discourse, presents itself independently of the traditional and modern discourse.
خلاصه ماشینی:
To date, no independent research has been conducted regarding the Third Way discourse in the Constitutional era, but in some sources, points have been raised about it; as an example, Haeri (1985) in the book "Shiism and Constitutionalism in Iran and the Role of Iranians Residing in Iraq," by placing Sheikh Fazlullah Nouri among a minority of religious scholars, has attempted to introduce the majority of religious leaders as being between the traditional and modern/progressive discourses in the Constitutional Revolution.
All in all, the most important point of distinction between this research and previous studies is that the present article, by employing the aforementioned theoretical framework and emphasizing power, ideology, and resistance, separates the Third Way discourse from the modern and traditional discourses and depicts its nature in an independent manner.
Seyyed Mohammad Tabataba'i Tabataba'i, in the midst of the Constitutional Revolution and after the event of the Minor Migration, performed various social actions and expressed various statements that all indicated resistance against the traditional discourse; for example, an excerpt from his petition to Mozaffar ad-Din Shah after the event of the Minor Migration of the scholars to the shrine of Abd al-Azim al-Hasani (in Shawwal of the year 1323 AH) is described as follows: "Your Majesty!
The third question is, "Who is the author, and what is his position of power and social standing?" The author of the letter, Seyyed Mohammad Tabataba'i, is one of the most important carriers of the third way discourse in the Constitutional era.
(
, 
, 
)
